I agree, I think he's a bit like Stoner, he'll go fast with anythinggodlameroso wrote:I have heard here and there that Alonso isn't a particularly good development driver, maybe this will actually help McLaren.
4 days in a row is too much, I think Kevin will run at least one day, its the most logic opcion and it will give more information to the team.Javert wrote:Next test if Alonso can't run we'll have 4 days for Button, or will Magnussen get some time?
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Well, we all know that it isnt so important but I am happy to see that he will have the chance of driving again.Richard wrote:It would also save face by showing Kevin's role is important.
PP is an aerodynamicist. He wouldn't have had anything to do with things like MGU seals.Maynard G. Krebs wrote:So Peter Prodromou didn't leave RB until March or April last year, and he wasn't able to alert Honda that this was a problem even though "other manufacturers faced the same problem last year"?
I think Ron will point and laugh at him.Richard wrote:It would also save face by showing Kevin's role is important.
I have no reason to bash PP, but to believe that he didn't know anything about a major flaw in the PU you would have to believe that it didn't come up in any meetings he was in, no emails, no coffee pot chatter? I am just surprised that it is being said that this was a known problem last year for multiple teams and yet Honda didn't get a handle on it? PP probably isn't even the only engineer poached from other teams by McHonda. I guess it makes me wonder about the validity of reports that this was a problem for multiple teams last year.trinidefender wrote:PP is an aerodynamicist. He wouldn't have had anything to do with things like MGU seals.Maynard G. Krebs wrote:So Peter Prodromou didn't leave RB until March or April last year, and he wasn't able to alert Honda that this was a problem even though "other manufacturers faced the same problem last year"?
All the evidence from the last few seasons suggests Button isn't a great development driver either.godlameroso wrote:I have heard here and there that Alonso isn't a particularly good development driver, maybe this will actually help McLaren.
The term development driver or the thought that drivers can develop modern day F1 cars is totally outdated. In the old days when you could test during the season. The drivers input was vital because he could really go through all the different development parts and give his opinion. Also the cars nowadays are so complicated its hard for the drivers the differentiate between different parts because you talking about such small margins. Drivers only give their opinion but ultimately the engineers take the decision on how to proceed with upgrades. Or do you think that Vettel has developed the RB's, I would put my money on Newey and his group of engineers. The only input Vettel would have had are general things like, balance, under steer or over steer, or lack or front or rear grip. But any driver is capable of that, of course some drivers like Button,Vettel and Raikonnen need the car to be absolutely perfect. While driver like Hamilton, Alonso and Ricciardo can hustle a car around so their feedback might be different.mrluke wrote:All the evidence from the last few seasons suggests Button isn't a great development driver either.godlameroso wrote:I have heard here and there that Alonso isn't a particularly good development driver, maybe this will actually help McLaren.
I thinks it's just a get out clause from the V8 days so that the manufacturers could carry on developing the engines making them cheaper and more reliable without actually developing the engines.turbof1 wrote:Nice stuff Facts Only, thanks for the insight. It seems that those rules were merely a scare crow rather then something that really was a trade-off between reliability and keeping secrets indoor.