timbo wrote:Williams definitely deserve credit for choosing a direction which yielded them overall performance (=results) and sticking with it. Don't forget they cleanly beat McLaren with a same PU and budget advantage. And they managed to develop a car as good or better as their rivals, remember F1 is like Red Queen's race, had Williams not been developing (and successfully) their car they'd quickly fall behind (like what usually happens to FI).
I think that is the benefits of having Pat Symonds in the team.
Ferrari OTOH for years has been failing to update car over the year and also invested in areas which didn't produce them much performance. I hope that Allison can provide needed direction. A good indicator over this season would be them maintaining a good development pace and closing the gap to rivals. There are already positive signs in that drivers find the car more driveable, something which Ferrari lacked not only last year, but also before (Massa struggles mid-2013, clear problems with 2012 car).
they didnt beat mclaren with the same PU... there are levels of support you can get from mercedes the pu manufacturer... im willing to bet williams got a better package than mclaren got.....(wolf part owner of williams and his wife is a test driver at williams counts for something)
mclaren has complained about designing their car with one set of pu specifications in mind and getting a different spec pu from mercedes... i dont believe i have heard williams complain about that... mclaren also complained about access to pu data and a few other things...
only a fool would believe that mercedes would give their competition the exact same engine that they were using after all customer team or not they are the COMPETITION.
i'm just not drinking the williams koolaid.
i also dont really buy into the mercedes fanboy craze saying mercedes is some car with superior aero compared to the other top teams...its all about the PU