The Sauber F1 Team has announced in a statement that it has extended the contracts of its current drivers, Marcus Ericcson and Felipe Nasr.The Swede and the Brazilian will again form the driver line-up for the Swiss Team in the 2016 FIA Formula One World Championship.
This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
Some of Saubers attempts at defence were so tragic as to be hilarious.
"He's never driven a 2015 Ferrari engine, he could kill someone"
Quite incredible to hear that Ericsson & Nasr had no idea VDG & Sutil had contracts already and we're still on the scene. In a less shady business than F1 that would qualify as a quite major act of fraud.
WaikeCU wrote:They really have worked themselves into an entirely huge mess. Lawyers of Nasr and Ericsson are not happy that they didn't know Sauber still had strings attached with VDG. Sauber surely doesn't shine confidence towards their drivers, managers and also their sponsors.
I totally agree it is a mess.
I am not taking any side on this (just do not know enough who has said/signed what when), but basically and whatever you may think of Sauber as a team, they would surely not have done such a step, if they would not think they have a strong argument in the Sauber-VDG contract. Judgement based on such principle that if you don't you do not run a 300m€ enterprise.
Perhaps money has clouded their judgement, but at least one of their counselors/lawyers must have seen a way of stepping out of the VDG contract.
WaikeCU wrote:Judgement based on such principle that if you don't you do not run a 300m€ enterprise.
Perhaps money has clouded their judgement, but at least one of their counselors/lawyers must have seen a way of stepping out of the VDG contract.
I think that for Sauber the urge of money was so big on the end of the season that they had no real choice. It was either going bankrupt or sign Nasr and Ericsson for a direct financial injection and then hope that they could write off VdG and Sutil
I have to admit: if safety concerns are the only arguments you can bring forward, then the team has to be in a very tight situation.
Nasr and Ericsonn already have their own lawyers on the case. If the judge effectively rules that vd Garde has to drive, Sauber will be spending a lot more hours in the court room.
However, vd Garde's lawyer also had some bogus arguments, claiming that Sauber would not breach Nasr's and Ericsonn's contracts by running vd garde. Yeah right.
And before the day is over there will be an appeal.
Don't see how it can have gone this far, the series ought to have moved in and brokered a deal last week.
With that said I don't see how vdG can claim a drive, economic compensation sure, but a drive?
It's not his property, it's Saubers and if Sauber want to give the seat it to someone it is up to them (provided that they pay contractual restitution that is).
Did VDG actually had a contract to actually race? Or did he had an option for a seat this year? i remembered the option but don't know if that has changed.
From what I understand, or what some newspaper have reported, it was an option. Not sure how binding that is, but given Saubers arguments at the Victorian Court, it seems that contract are rather quite complex (as you could imagine, as it involves a paydriver, so any contract extends beyond the driver simply being contracted to drive the car, but also includes payment [by his backers] to Sauber as a team).
If the verdict is on Wednesday, it certainly isn't leaving a lot of time to fit that seat...
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II #Team44 supporter
Daliracing wrote:Did VDG actually had a contract to actually race? Or did he had an option for a seat this year? i remembered the option but don't know if that has changed.
From what I understood, was it an option in his testcontract, and Sauber lifted that in July. So fram that point on it was a race contract.
By the way, what do you guys think about Kaltenborn? Will she survive this mess?
Difficult to say. In all honesty, Sauber has not thrived at all under Kaltenborn. Peter Sauber had to deal with problems too, but he actually did managed to do so!
You can drop Kaltenborn, but who will take her place? Peter decides on that, but does not want to return himself as head principle. I simply can't see anybody else taking up that job.
I'd also say it's hard to effectively judge Kaltenborn, because we can't be sure how much of a challenge she is facing (financially) and how her actions respond to the success or failure within the team. One thing is for sure though; Her job is anything but easy and I wonder if there is anyone outthere who could do a better job. Lets not forget, 2014 was a disaster - a disaster that is directly linked to the Ferrari PU and Saubers financial struggles. Ferrari may have held on to 4th in 2014, but that was with a significant higher budget, as a works-team, and with the likes of Alonso and Raikoennen. To put that into perspective - the top 10 finishers get points and 4 teams with 2 car each already occupy the first 8 places. From the midfielders, ForceIndia, McLaren, Lotus and TorroRosso managed to fill those gaps (most with much better PUs or higher budgets) - while Sauber managed not a single point. Sauber has been fighting with a smaller budget year after year as their struggles become more serious. I'm not sure any of this can be attributed to Monisha.
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II #Team44 supporter
Jonnycraig wrote:Some of Saubers attempts at defence were so tragic as to be hilarious.
"He's never driven a 2015 Ferrari engine, he could kill someone"
Quite incredible to hear that Ericsson & Nasr had no idea VDG & Sutil had contracts already and we're still on the scene. In a less shady business than F1 that would qualify as a quite major act of fraud.