How do you know they didn't consider it? Because they don't use it?JDC123 wrote:Do you even understand what you have put? Why are you talking about heat exchangers? Carbon fibre in the use of an engine cover is quite bad because it retains heat around the engine rather than transfer it into the atmosphere. Teams use gold foil in certain areas because it has a high heat conductivity so transfers heat from very hot areas quickly. If you were to use aluminium heat would escape much quicker meaning you could have much smaller hot air outlets at the back of the car. What I am saying is I am surprised the engineers haven't considered using different materials. Carbon fibre seems to be used in F1 for the sake of using it.wesley123 wrote:Carbon retains the heat produced? Sounds like a pretty good idea to use carbon then. Teams duct and channel the cooling airflow as optimally as possible through the heat exchangers out of the car. Adding heat conducting bodywork(like aluminium) to the car simply means you're adding another heat exchanger to the car for no good reason. Plus, the added weight is an immense downside as well.JDC123 wrote:Why do teams still insist on using carbon fibre engine covers and sidepods when it has terrible heat conduction properties and retains the heat produced from the radiators? Aluminium although heavy is much better at conducting heat and would therefore be much better in areas of high heat concentration under the engine cover as it transfers heat much quicker from inside the engine cover to the atmosphere.
'Perhaps' they don't use it.. because it isn't necessary to do so.. + probably using the light weight carbon fibre brings more performance, than having the best heat conducting material with the added weight it brings..