I don't, the situation is truly dire.dren wrote:I'd put money on an Alonso podium or two later in the season.PlatinumZealot wrote:True, but Alonso is thinking of 2016. He doesn't really care about 2015.
I don't, the situation is truly dire.dren wrote:I'd put money on an Alonso podium or two later in the season.PlatinumZealot wrote:True, but Alonso is thinking of 2016. He doesn't really care about 2015.
This is the scenario I fear but one I think is very likely to happen.J0rd4n wrote: They supposedly used four engines in pre season testing. Even if they become competitive they may be sent to the back of the grid anyway if they've eaten through all their engines. Just throwing out a potential situation.
No ones expecting them to be dominant like Mercedes. Plus even Mercedes only managed to reach the final podium position when starting at the back of the grid. This year McLaren won't get a car that can start from the back of the grid and smash through the field. So starting out of position won't help them, and certainly won't allow them to get to the prospect of a podium.Andres125sx wrote:I don´t see that as a mayor problem, Mercedes proved last season if you´re competitive it doesn´t matter that much where you start from
But that´s supposing they´re competitive enough obviously (and reliable), that is the main problem I think
I don't think Alonso can wait any longer. If mclaren can't sort its problems this year, we might see Alonso take another trip to another team like RedbullPlatinumZealot wrote:True, but Alonso is thinking of 2016. He doesn't really care about 2015.
I don't see that. Red Bull prides itself on it's driver development program, from WSR up to the full RBR race team.ismail1991 wrote:I don't think Alonso can wait any longer. If mclaren can't sort its problems this year, we might see Alonso take another trip to another team like RedbullPlatinumZealot wrote:True, but Alonso is thinking of 2016. He doesn't really care about 2015.
http://www.pitpass.com/45446/Alguersuar ... -Marko-rowefuloni wrote:I don't recall any story about Red Bull demanding Toro Rosso's car to get out of the way, or anything like that. No polemic episode like Sauber (Perez) vs Ferrari (Alonso). Did this happen sometime? Cause I agree that STR looks faster than RBR right now.
Yes, it seems Ferrari is closer than the 0,7s to MercedesLorenzo_Bandini wrote:Raikkonen was very close to the Mercedes pace on the soft tyres. Absolutly no drop off.
Actually, right now he's thinking of 2010 according to some newspapers.PlatinumZealot wrote:True, but Alonso is thinking of 2016. He doesn't really care about 2015.
Nico and Lewis were on detuned engine mode ...Artur Craft wrote:Yes, it seems Ferrari is closer than the 0,7s to MercedesLorenzo_Bandini wrote:Raikkonen was very close to the Mercedes pace on the soft tyres. Absolutly no drop off.
If everybody was on same fuel level(likely not), it would be quite close from Mercedes to Ferrari and then a big gap to everybody else
...
Mercedes likely sandbagged a bit but, still, Ferrari can be very close to them on race pace, perhaps.(Lewis' racesim is even less representative with fewer laps)
My bet is that Williams is definitely far behind Ferrari. I'm not a naive guy that believes Ferrari will fight for the tittle and etc but, imho, they are not massively behind Mercedes going by the racesim laps, even if we don't know the fuel loads. Rosberg could be on full tanks while Kimi on 3/4 or less, but Rosberg still kept getting slower on a shorter stint and Kimi kept improving until the end of the session.
I just wanted to post this in case Ferrari surprises in QLF(by not being that much behind Mercedes) and then people can't say: "oh, nobody saw this coming"
I stand corrected - looks like McLaren might just squeak in with Button getting a 1:31.6. Even if Merc put in a 1:26 in Q1 they should make it through (just).Moose wrote:Pretty sure at this rate McLaren can't make the 107% cut off.
Their best laps atm are 1:36s, and they look like they're pretty representative of what the car can do.
Q1's fastest lap is likely to be around 1:28-1:29, which means 1:34.5ish is likely to be the 107% time.