gruntguru wrote:Let me see . . . perhaps because in common parlance a "diff" is "a big cast iron thing that keeps the rear wheels apart". (as opposed to "a device that sums angular displacements".)
Or did it grow from the term "locked diff" which is amost identical but not in the slightest oxymoronic. That is because a locked diff could be a diff which has been un-diffed - using perhaps an arc welder or maybe even a spool. Oh well, engineers can abuse the English language as "good" as anyone.
Ever heard an engineer use the term "AC current"?
Here's Wikipedia's definition of an automotive differential, which would seem to qualify as "common parlance":
"In automobiles and other wheeled vehicles, the differential allows the outer drive wheel to rotate faster than the inner drive wheel during a turn. This is necessary when the vehicle turns, making the wheel that is traveling around the outside of the turning curve roll farther and faster than the other. The average of the rotational speed of the two driving wheels equals the input rotational speed of the drive shaft. An increase in the speed of one wheel is balanced by a decrease in the speed of the other."
A "spool" is a rigid shaft coupling composed of a single monolithic part. A 'diff" is mechanical device usually composed of a set of bevel gears that functions as described above. A spool is not a diff, and a diff is not a spool. The term differential implies a device that has certain capabilities. If you were to weld the bevel gears of a common auto diff together, thus disabling the differential function of the device, logically it would no longer meet the definition of a differential. So why would you continue to call it a diff?
If you castrate a bull, obviously it is no longer a bull. It is a steer. But according to your logic it should be called a bull steer. Can't be both things, just like a spool diff.