What do you mean by crancase scavenging?gruntguru wrote:Probably wouldn't need crankcase scavenging either - with an electric turbocharger.
What do you mean by crancase scavenging?gruntguru wrote:Probably wouldn't need crankcase scavenging either - with an electric turbocharger.
Sure it would be quite challenging to tune the scavenging so that it works efficiently over a certain rpm range.WilliamsF1 wrote:With the exhaust pulse of a 2 stroke the energy recovery will be phenomenal, may be up to 50%
Using the underside of the piston to pump fresh charge into the cylinder (the system used on most small 2-strokes)Abarth wrote:What do you mean by crancase scavenging?gruntguru wrote:Probably wouldn't need crankcase scavenging either - with an electric turbocharger.
OK, thats what I understood too, but since I ruled it out in my post anyway, I got confused.gruntguru wrote:Using the underside of the piston to pump fresh charge into the cylinder (the system used on most small 2-strokes)Abarth wrote:What do you mean by crancase scavenging?gruntguru wrote:Probably wouldn't need crankcase scavenging either - with an electric turbocharger.
Uh no, I never meant to use crancase:J.A.W. wrote:Or put another way, a system utilizing apparent ambient vacuum to draw air into the engine (crankcase) on the piston upstroke, ready for pressure-sonic pulse/timed-aimed duct transfer to the combustion chamber,
- in the latter part of the downstroke..
This seeming simplicity is complicated by the need for expensive rolling element bearings & discreet sealing
arrangements required by high output mills, but has shown itself to be robust enough in untold hard use applications
- from the likes of chainsaws to racing in everything from miniscule IC racers to F1-type powerboat machines.
Other 2Ts such as the venerable Detroit Diesel - used an external 'supercharger' pump for charging the cylinders,
& often operated with an additional exhaust driven turbo too..
I recall laughing when M-B advertised a 'first' for their diesel car mills as being pioneering 4 poppet valve per
cylinder units, when D-D had used such a set-up since before WW2..
Schnürle scavenging has nothing to do with crancase scavenging, all happens above piston. Instead of cross flow, it is a sort of loop scavenging.I'd go for a DI 2 stroke engine with classic Schnürle loop scavenging, and sump lubrication. Of course the MGU-H would allow for this, as no crancase pre compression would be needed.
Was the Mercedes a 4 stroke?J.A.W. wrote:I recall laughing when M-B advertised a 'first' for their diesel car mills as being pioneering 4 poppet valve per cylinder units, when D-D had used such a set-up since before WW2..
Why bother with a crankshaft and crankcase for a range extender two stroke.Abarth wrote:Sure it would be quite challenging to tune the scavenging so that it works efficiently over a certain rpm range.WilliamsF1 wrote:With the exhaust pulse of a 2 stroke the energy recovery will be phenomenal, may be up to 50%
Another interesting application of such a design would be a compact 1cyl. range extender for EV, running at constant rpm, having a scavenging compressor eg. attached directly at the crankshaft, as well as a compounding turbine. Startup would be with the generator which is there anyway, efficiency would be "generous". It would work only at one fixed speed, anything could be tuned for exactly one operation point.
Of course there would be losses from generating electicity to storing and consuming it (with wheel motors perhaps), but I think it still could be an efficient drive.
riff_raff wrote:It might be tough to get a 2T poppet exhaust valve system to work reliably at F1 speeds. Plus there is the issue of having intake ports in the cylinder walls, which would require long piston skirts, long conrods, and oil rings located at the bottom of the long piston skirts. Even with an electrically assisted turbo, it may not be easy to obtain efficient scavenging over a wide speed range.