Got a source for that?gilgen wrote:cant be bothered reading all the bumpf about paint, but just to say, the leaving out of metallic flakes made the finish lighter. 25l of a new lighter paint supplied by alzo nobel was used with 13 coats sprayed on. but a saving of even the 2 kg quoted is totally irrelevant anyway. if alonso shaved off his beard, they would probably save as much.
25l? "lighter paint"? 13 coats? A saving of 2kg is relevant for sure.
Solvents (thinners/reducers) are used to influence the spraying/painting viscosity. Your example is correct but if you add thinner in your example you have to leave out something else (pigment, hardeners, catalysts, ...) to keep the same amount of paint. Thinning paint leads to less 'colour coverage' but easier paint application, in the end you will need to apply more layers to get the same result.avatar wrote: Surely the fact the thinner evaporates is why it makes a difference? - less paint is laid on same surface area.
1m² thinned to cover 2 sq m
Paint 1m², thinner evaporates = half the mass on same area vs 1m² of unthinned paint
(with half the mass+thinner left "in the tin")
That being said I 'm willing to accept that a new paint job/different paint/different colours makes a difference, but 2kg is rubbish.