Perhaps Hamilton's biggest error is to allow the team to pit Rosberg first. If Rosberg would have had to wait for Hamilton vettel would have likely passed him. The same as happened in China.evered7 wrote: Hamilton must take some blame as well for he worked with the team to go for that strategy. I guess the VSC/SC tricked Mercedes into pitting Hamilton and that he had to wait till the Manor passed him to get going from his box. Rosberg gets a lucky break; will be interesting to see how he works with it.
like he did in 2009,10,11,12,13?J0rd4n wrote:I hope you are right, but the incidents in Monaco 2014 really affected his performance in the European part of the season and I fear this could happen again and with Ferrari closer this year it might be far more costly. Different circumstances though, Hamilton always defeats adversity in the end.PlatinumZealot wrote:This race really had me gutted. But alas this is Monaco, when it's not a boring procession it's a roll of the dice.THe only upside for me is Hamilton will come out stronger from this and mark my words, it'll be total domination from here on out.
You're right of course.henra wrote:Oh Boy, the level of desperation of some here is simply mind boggling. It was a clear mistake by the Team (doesn't matter if he contributed or not). Happens where Human beings are involved. Lewis lost 10 Points. He will get over it. And you all should, too. He is sitting in the fastest car (still by a margin) and tends ro be a bit quicker than Nico in the race. He is leading the WDC. So, why all the panic and desperation ???
Chances are it will keep the WDC open a little bit longer which I generally consider a good thing. End of Story and now, let's move on.
He was always going down the inside, so the Stewards decision (when compared with Alonso's) is inconsistent. I wouldn't say Ricciardo's move was a "mistake", it was deliberate barging. There is simply no room to overtake at Monaco, so this is the only way to get passed.jknights wrote:What I dont understand is the difference between the Alonso incident and the Ricciardo incident. The Ricciardo one is a distinct mistake and barging of an opponent!
.henra wrote:Lewis lost 10 Points.
I dont share this at all. By this logic, we should be strapping weight to the [champion] leaders car to make it a more "level playing field". Or bring back double points final madness to improve "the show". What makes this inacceptable is that it was an "unforced" error. They werent under pressure and yet they committed this stupidity. When they started showing the Mercedes crew jump out to do a pitstop, i was at first laughing in disbelieve wondering if they were just doing it for show. Then i saw Hamilton come in and in knew it wasnt going to be enough. The team might have lacked GPS, but basic first grade math would have been enough to establish that a 20 second gap wasnt going to cut it - and with every pit stop, there is ALWAYS some risk in that it may take longer; an error, a sticky tyre, traffic in the pits or what not. Yet they still pitted him, at Monaco of all places, with what - 6 laps to go, despite having the freshest set of all his direct competitors? Idiots, there is no other word. Complete morons.f1316 wrote:Unfortunate/undeserved as the result may have been, purely from a close championship perspective it was a good thing.
Exactly. I unfortunately cant review the data, but i am fairly confident that the gap between Hamilton and Rosberg was larger than the gap between Vettel and who ever was behind him. So even if Vettel had pitted, he would have had to overtake at least the cars he would have lost position over by pitting, then get past both Mercedes... In what, 6 laps. In monaco. Of course.GrandAxe wrote:If Vettel and Nico had pitted, they would most likely have ended up behind both Kimi and Riciardo, so I don't see any permutation in which they could have been any sort of threat. The strategy call was just dumb.
At times yes. 2009 he won in a very bad car and salvaged his season. 13 he took his maiden victory despite struggling with the car under braking in the first half of the season and loosing out in Silverstone. I was trying to say it's very rare we see him defeated.gilgen wrote:like he did in 2009,10,11,12,13?J0rd4n wrote:I hope you are right, but the incidents in Monaco 2014 really affected his performance in the European part of the season and I fear this could happen again and with Ferrari closer this year it might be far more costly. Different circumstances though, Hamilton always defeats adversity in the end.PlatinumZealot wrote:This race really had me gutted. But alas this is Monaco, when it's not a boring procession it's a roll of the dice.THe only upside for me is Hamilton will come out stronger from this and mark my words, it'll be total domination from here on out.
He didn't say a handicap should be enforced, just stated the obvious, that from a 'close championship' perspective it was a good thing. That is a simple truth, nothing to argue for or against!Phil wrote:I dont share this at all. By this logic, we should be strapping weight to the [champion] leaders car to make it a more "level playing field". Or bring back double points final madness to improve "the show". What makes this inacceptable is that it was an "unforced" error...f1316 wrote:Unfortunate/undeserved as the result may have been, purely from a close championship perspective it was a good thing.