Williams FW37 Mercedes

[LookBackTime]

[edu2703]

https://twitter.com/Eduardo100000/statu ... 9993153536

[ChrisF1]

Bloomin 'eck, well if that is legal and there is a loophole, bravo!

[LookBackTime]

[Samraj_official]

what the hell very interesting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ................loophole.... =D>

[trinidefender]

Is the vertical part at the edge of the floor just in front of the tyre part of a loophole as well?

I find it quite odd that this loophole has been here for so long and yet nobody has found it yet, good job Williams.

[LookBackTime]

Craig Scarborough ‏@ScarbsF1 2m2 minutes ago
@tgruener a closer look of the side on photos and drawing the dimensions. shows the wing and fence below aren't in a legal position

[LookBackTime]

Craig Scarborough ‏@ScarbsF1 2m2 minutes ago
@tgruener a closer look of the side on photos and drawing the dimensions. shows the wing and fence below aren't in a legal position

2017 regulation change may be?

[Owen.C93]

Yeah there's no way that side skirt is legal. Might be testing for some future ground affect focused regulations.

[Morteza]

https://twitter.com/tgruener/status/613351705871282176

[GPR-A duplicate2]

http://img2.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Sus ... 875674.jpg

What the F****** hell is that? Can there be such a big loop hole? Hell no yeah.

[PhillipM]

Could even be a precursor to a new sidepod/floor that achieves a similar effect which they don't want anyone to see yet.

[domh245]

They look a little bit like monkey seats to my eye. Perhaps Williams are looking at how these behave in isolation, but how much sense that makes to people who know about that kind of thing (i.e. not me!) - will be interesting to see

[edu2703]

[Silent Storm]

https://twitter.com/albrodpul/status/613366488561545216 Williams winglet not legal.
The green boxes do not allow installing aerodynamic appendices according to technical regulations