Perhaps Hamilton decided to take it easier than Rosberg because he knew he had something to loose, whereas Rosberg was just pushing for the win, and that worked against him, loosing heat? Pushing to catch the Williams wont have hurt Rosberg's tyre temps.PlatinumZealot wrote:Best race of the season! =D>
I think Grosjean needs some more councelling. lol. He dodged a car that was never there! It was him why poor old Jenson crashed out.
Bottas was the faster Williams driver for the first stint, but he looked like an amateur compared to Massa once on the hard tyres. I am in support of those who said Williams should have given a team order for Bottas to pass but it woulnd't have made any difference. Massa would have caught and passed him on the second stint anyway. People forget that Massa finished 36 seconds up the road in the same car. That's an outright trouncing if you ask me.
Kimi, Kimi, Kimi... you couldn't have done anything more embarrassing to your self. Why chicken out and go into the pits so early? Just because your Team mate passed you on track?
Rosberg was super fast when the track got wet the second time. Why did none of the reporters ask the Team why? I know Hamilton said he was losing temeprature and tyre pressure, but it was a realy mystery how Rosberg was able to keep the tyres warm. Thank God Hamilton made the call at the right time. Almost Schumacheresque.
Rosberg was 10 seconds behind with 8 laps to go. He was never going to catch Lewis, so I doubt he was pushing.Moose wrote:Actually no - only in the last 10 laps were they both in clean air with tires that weren't in some way compromised. During that period, Lewis was 0.5 seconds a lap faster.
Nico said before the race his setup is more optimised for cooler conditions. Which would suggest he was working the tyres harder so maybe that contributed a little too.Moose wrote:It may also be a symptom of what we've been observing over the past couple of years - Hamilton has generally been slightly kinder on his tyres than Rosberg.
Nah, at no point after 1st pitstop was vettel more than 2s behind raikkonen and he would pass him right there if he was still behind him. I think this spin was some time after he passed him already.PlatinumZealot wrote:Part of the reason why Vettel caught Kimi:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CowtAuigNz8
Yes, it was clear from the get-go that Merc was waiting for the pitstops to leapfrog them. The RIGHT strategy would have been to have Bottas back them up and allow Massa to disappear in the distance, not have Massa move over!GPR-A wrote:And I thought Williams only bought PU from Mercedes, didn't know they have also bought brainless strategists too. Absolute third rate strategy call. The way they were running so close together, it was EVIDENT that one of the Mercs would undercut AT LEAST one of the Williams at the pit stop. Instead, they should have let Bottas pass and create sufficient gap in front, so that they both could have got comfortably ahead of Mercs after Pit Stops. Not sure if Williams were thinking that they could hold the Mercs for entire race length, if so, absolute nut cases.
That's right. Bottas was marginally faster in the first stint, but not enough to catch Massa (even with DRS). After that, Massa was clearly faster. And not just a little bit.PlatinumZealot wrote: Bottas was the faster Williams driver for the first stint, but he looked like an amateur compared to Massa once on the hard tyres. I am in support of those who said Williams should have given a team order for Bottas to pass but it woulnd't have made any difference. Massa would have caught and passed him on the second stint anyway. People forget that Massa finished 36 seconds up the road in the same car. That's an outright trouncing if you ask me.
just let bottas make his race, try to pass massa, like every other driver. instead they stop him and erase any (small) chance of winning the race.ringo wrote:enckboaz wrote:But they DID gave team orders: not to race each other.ismail1991 wrote:In addition, I don't understand the comments about Massa letting Bottas to overtake. Aren't we the ones hating team orders saying drivers to let go each other. If Bottas was faster, he should have passed Massa but he wasn't much faster. The reason he was catching Massa was the huge help of the drs.
Sky Reporters to me aren't sincere anymore. When team orders happen, they began to talk how wrong it is. When williams didn't say Massa to let Bottas, this time they said that they should let Bottas overtake Massa.
But when they realize that bottas was faster they give him the green light only for a clean pass. with the same car, with the same condition is quite impossible to overtakewith a "clean pass".
it was a team order, and clearly a mistake,
But you want a team order to put Bottas in front of Massa?
What are you complaining about again, because you seem to want team orders any how.