bhall II wrote:Andres125sx wrote:So someone thinks it´s all about the car, drivers do nothing, it doesn´t matter if you put Alonso/Hamilton or Stevens/Maldonado inside the car, they will get same results, and my argumentation is so absurd it deserve a downvote...
I don't vote. So, it wasn't me. Nonetheless, you've
completely misappropriated what I said.
Phil gets it...
...the car defines the maximum possible that can be achieved. It's a driver that gets it as close to that potential as possible.
I´m afraid it´s the other way around, neither of you got what I was trying to say...
Andres125sx wrote: I´m not saying he did more than his car allowed, but he got more from his car than all his rivals from theirs.
My fail probably, sometimes I can´t express myself properly in spanish, so in english I have some serious problems from time to time
What I mean is if F1 drivers usually reach 95% of car potential, if some driver reach 97% he´s still within the car limits, but since he´s reaching a higher limit than his rivals, he could be finishing the race on a position his car does not deserve. This is not posible when the difference is like current difference between Mercedes and the rest, but when the difference is below half a second, drivers can make the difference.
To avoid suspicious interpretations since many people here know I support Alonso, let´s take 2008 season as an example. IMO Ferrari was a faster car than McLaren, but the difference was small. Since the difference was small drivers can and actually made the difference. Let say Hamilton reached 97% of the car potential, while Massa only reached 95%. In that scenario Hamilton put his car on a position it didn´t deserve, because there was a faster car, but he won.
He didn´t drive his car beyond the limits because as you say that means crashing, but he put his car beyond his deserved position.