http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/33479911 Article by McNish (BBC) that should be treated as another piece of McLaren's media offensive. Tailor made for the message, timing and demography. Although the title says "Cracks appearing between Honda and McLaren" there's little about nature of said cracks except for obvious engine performance:
"It is quite clear to everyone in F1 that the Honda engine is responsible for the vast majority of McLaren's performance shortfall to Mercedes."
Vast majority is not very specific, I wonder if packaging that was a joint effort of engine and chassis makers with all the pros and cons is included or divided from this
There's nothing about McLaren but everything about Honda including: "cultural" aspect, a lot of history and an interesting information that has zero relevance to F1: "In the road car marketplace, Honda has been overtaken by Nissan and is now the third-biggest Japanese manufacturer, not the second". What if they were second, would the engine be better then? No. Makes you wonder why this kind of article didn't appear before the season. I guess they were waiting for under-performing and unreliable engine to shed a light on history, Honda's market position and warn:
"If you look across motorsport, Honda is struggling everywhere except the British Touring Car Championship, Honda does not seem to be the same company with the same racing spirit it had in the past."
No thoughts about McLaren, I guess unlike Honda it's the same company like in the 90s and seasons with a different engine like 2007, 2009, 2012-2014 didn't happen. As if using 90s as a benchmark for 2015 F1 and hybrid engines wasn't at best questionable.