djos wrote:
Did you think about what you wrote? Let's think about this logically for a moment:
large downforce* = good traction, good braking, good tire management (reduced slip, improved surface contact etc etc)
It doesn't necessarily improve traction, downforce needs speed to have an effect. Traction mainly applies to the slowr corners
Same for braking, doesn't necessarily have to be true. As the car brakes it would push the front closer to the ground, making aero sensitivity an important point of the braking process and committing to the corner. And on that, red Bull is the sole team to run a full-width 6-plane front wing.
Tire management also can be an issue, as at some point you'll load the tires too much(GTPs at Road Atlanta anyone?).
On the other hand Monaco and Hungary prove the RB11 has excellent downforce and is lacking the PU to be truly competitive.
Like said, downforce alone doesn't make a good car.