I was under the impression they have 3 FIA fuel sensors?SimRacer wrote: Again... had you watched the race you'd know that the #18 was already in front by over a minute on pace alone and outperforming everyone else with ease when it first started being penalized around the 3 hour mark or so.
Doh, getting my wires crossed.Cold Fussion wrote: There was also no #19 porsche djos.
The first penalty to the #18, a 5 second stop/ go was only 1.5 hours into the race,SimRacer wrote: Again... had you watched the race you'd know that the #18 was already in front by over a minute on pace alone and outperforming everyone else with ease when it first started being penalized around the 3 hour mark or so.
You facts on the time of the 1st penalty and the gap between the two cars was incorrectSimRacer wrote:Well then I take it back and hereby agree that the #18 displayed a lackluster performance all that afternoon and the #17 were far too superior on its own merit. And all the Internetz peoplez can be happy now. [-o<bdr529 wrote:The first penalty to the #18, a 5 second stop/ go was only 1.5 hours into the race,SimRacer wrote: Again... had you watched the race you'd know that the #18 was already in front by over a minute on pace alone and outperforming everyone else with ease when it first started being penalized around the 3 hour mark or so.
And I'm pretty sure they had a lead of 30-35 seconds at that time, because the #18 came out of the pits right in front of the #17
the two of them bump shortly after that and Webber got pushed off the track bit
SimRacer:
had you watched the race you'd know that
The new gte rules allow them to change only certain areas they also have to fit in well defined windows for downforce, drag,weight and power and then the FIA will do its BOP.Cold Fussion wrote:So what will be the practical differences between the GTE 2016 rules and the old GT1 rules?Pierce89 wrote:The 2016 gte rules allow alot more downforce than previous iterations (and a little bit more power too).
First of all I didn't need to check the facts, I watched the race that's how I know when it happened.SimRacer wrote:Although entirely beside the point of the argument, my facts are not incorrect it's just that I'm not a nitpicker freak that feel that I must check and quote the exact timestamps and stats just for the sake of being absolutely precise about non-relevant details.bdr529 wrote: You facts on the time of the 1st penalty and the gap between the two cars was incorrectSimRacer:
had you watched the race you'd know that
But it's interesting to know that you feel the need to act as djos babysitter. Not that he needs of course, but do carry on if that matters so much to you and down-vote me again as many times as you please. =D>
Oh please, if you are going to take issue with someone's post, you should at least make sure you have your own facts sorted.SimRacer wrote:
Although entirely beside the point of the argument, my facts are not incorrect it's just that I'm not a nitpicker freak that feel that I must check and quote the exact timestamps and stats just for the sake of being absolutely precise about non-relevant details.
But it's interesting to know that you feel the need to act as djos babysitter. Not that he needs of course, but do carry on if that matters so much to you and down-vote me again as many times as you please. =D>