Espionage at Ferrari and McLaren

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
Rob W
0
Joined: 18 Aug 2006, 03:28

Post

Mosely's comments about the media and drivers seems oddly charitable for him.

http://www.f1technical.net/news/7082
“The FIA is very disappointed that Fernando Alonso and Pedro De La Rosa have been criticised in the press. They had no choice but to make available the information in their possession. It is up to every team to ensure that the rules of sporting fairness are respected. No driver should be put in the position in which Fernando and Pedro found themselves."
He does brings up a good point. There isn't a single driver on the grid who, if offered alleged information on how to be faster, would say "no, I don't want to know"... the only reason not to would be if they suspected it was a set-up - which they wouldn't have since Alonso was getting his info from a trusted test-driver, De La Rosa, who in-turn was getting it from Coulghan - someone he'd worked with for year.

In short, maligning the drivers for saying "let's see if it works" is really not the key issue here. The issue is team integrity/honesty. I've no doubt Ron Dennis is honest but was hamstrung by the actions of Coulghan who has bought the whole McLaren team into disrepute.

Rob W

FLC
FLC
0
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 14:01

Post

Indeed. Integrity and honesty. Ron Dennis and McLaren.
Is that why Mr. Coughlan hasn't even been officially fired from McLaren? Him who stunk, the only one? I wonder why that is. Maybe because he can still open his mouth and enlarge the damage already done? Maybe because they all know there, including Mr.Integrity himself, that what he did was known and accepted by them? That he was actually carrying the biggest risk personally? That he was the messenger?

Team Honesty hasn't even took off Mr.Stunk's picture and biography off their (updated) site. I'm guessing they are really, truly very ashamed of him and what he's done. Him alone. Nobody else knew. Not Whitmarsh, not Neal, Taylor, Lowe, Alonso, DLR, engineers and mechanics.
You would think that they'd be at least honest enough to add a sentence with his latest remarkable achievements, but no.

Contrary to what some here would like to think or make some others think, the team is guilty as a whole. It is more than reasonable to believe (to say the least) that Ron-Control Freak-Dennis knew, that the team knew. They're maybe honest on their spare time (though I doubt that too), not on the job. Surely they aren't honest as they would like some of us to believe. Not even close.

RacingManiac
RacingManiac
9
Joined: 22 Nov 2004, 02:29

Post

Tomba wrote:OK I am back and this discussion is back to facts :!:
mikep99 wrote:Seeing that McLaren are guilty. They should be made to change the Livery on the car for the last few races, to honour there engineering partners.
It was never proven that McLaren have designed their car based on the Ferrari documents that Coughlan has in his possession at his home.

In regards to this, please Ferrari fanboys stop arguing that McLaren are cheaters and that Hamilton or Alonso would not earn the title. They drive with what they have. If you would only look from an impartial point of view you might see that banning McLaren cars for 2 years would harm the sport even more than what Mosley and the FIA are pulling off now.
Seas wrote:Honestly, I was not surprised by FIA decision. They punished McLaren, but in the way they didn't destroy championship. What surprise me is why Ron didn't send Alonso strait to hell. The boy is pain in the ass, from day one. He want privileged status in team? OK, F**K OFF. If I am in Ron place, I will keep him in contract, but like spare driver, so he cant go to any other team. simply, I wil not relise him from his contract, but he will not have a drive in my team!!!!!!!
You must be joking. Alonso signed a contract to be a primary McLaren race driver. There is also a bit more of interest to Ron than just personal issues, the Mercedes shareholders for example who do not dislike 2 of their own drivers fighting for the championship.
Try that on your school exams kids, bring a cheat sheet in and if you get caught, say you didn't use it, see how well that flies with the authorities....

I mean come on, do people really lack that much common sense around here? :roll:

User avatar
Rob W
0
Joined: 18 Aug 2006, 03:28

Post

FLC wrote:...hasn't even took off Mr.Stunk's picture and biography off their (updated) site. I'm guessing they are really, truly very ashamed of him and what he's done.... You would think that they'd be at least honest enough to add a sentence with his latest remarkable achievements, but no.
They might be waiting until it can all be proven in a court to avoid a potential massive employment or slander battle later if they can't. It's only prudent and their lawyers would have advised them of such. He has been suspended from when it was first discovered and not allowed in McLaren's premises.

Rob W

User avatar
checkered
0
Joined: 02 Mar 2007, 14:32

Post

“The FIA is very disappointed that Fernando Alonso and Pedro De La Rosa have been criticised in the press. They had no choice but to make available the information in their possession. It is up to every team to ensure that the rules of sporting fairness are respected. No driver should be put in the position in which Fernando and Pedro found themselves."
Oddly charitable

indeed. They must've been criticised by and in the press for a great many reasons with regard to their actions in these events. Does Mosley mean that these drivers are, in his view, completely exonerated from their actions and the so called amnesty reflects that?

Hardly, he only holds the regulatory point of view that the team as a whole and its leadership by extension (the drivers apparently don't qualify as being in a managerial position) are, "Respondeat Superior", always ultimately responsible in FIA's regulatory book. This is perhaps a convenient detour around questions of, let's say, slightly more differentiated nature of responsibilities based on individuals' actions. In any case, the legal minds in the FIA, Mosley included, were overrun in their understanding that the drivers should've also been docked points no matter what:
"The lawyers all felt everything should go because how can you give the cup to a driver who may have had an unfair advantage over the other drivers. But on the other side of it we have a brilliant championship [battle] between Alonso and Hamilton, and the sporting people were saying 'If you interfere with that you are spoiling a very good championship. It wasn't the drivers' fault. You could say it's not the drivers' fault but then it never is. A driver can be disqualified because his car is a kilo underweight, it wouldn't make a difference but you have to have the principle. If you are outside the rules you are not in the game."
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/62451
Mosley also points to the ultimatum sent to the drivers (in the "charitable" quote) regarding the possible revoking of their super license if they didn't co-operate, ergo, they are not to be criticised for acting under regulatory duress. To me it also seems Mosley is merely saying that the FIA shouldn't have to go to individual drivers for such information, the responsibility for supplying that, too, ultimately lies with the team. Quite self evident statements of fact. That doesn't really address what the content of the messages indicates. Also if I've understood it correctly from news reports, the FIA had already secured the emails that they were requesting of the drivers from a third party. This makes the request and the so called amnesty seem oddly redundant with regard to the immediate purpose of securing information vital to the investigation.

If this case constitutes a precedent that any team member other than the very senior management can do as they please without the management's knowledge in certain knowledge that the worst punishment that follows can only be a collective one, it may prove to be a dangerous one. There isn't a single driver on the grid who, if offered information which clearly doesn't belong to his team, shouldn't inform both his team management and the FIA of potentially unsporting/illegal activity at his earliest possible convenience. I don't see how Alonso and de la Rosa could've acted in good faith with what they knew beyond a doubt to be privileged Ferrari information that certainly wasn't in their hands by Ferrari's consent.

The trail of possession of that information indicates otherwise, as does the established system of making specific queries via the same communication routes and protocols to the same persons that were all known to the drivers. The length of the period in which these communications were ongoing indicates otherwise. The casual manner of the content in those communications indicates that decisions and considerations regarding any possible obligations associated with receiving, using or being aware of unsporting/illegal possession of such materials and information had been made earlier, not considered or brushed aside. You're of course still free to draw your own conclusions on the details originally released by the FIA summary of evidence.

http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/ ... 130907.pdf

Still, the issue is (hopefully) now resolved. The WMSC is not a court of law, but a part of FIA's self regulatory system. I have no reason to believe that they have exceeded their purpose or mandate. I have no objection to de la Rosa, Alonso and Hamilton retaining their personal championship points and super licenses. Race they may and display their utmost skill as far as I'm concerned, without me feeling that what has transpired should be any further reflected on their performance. By no means I mean to malign anyone by pointing out certain detailed considerations that have been made public during the process, I'm merely exploring whether the process itself with regard to the intention behind it, is strenuous, applicable and effective enough. As a precedent a case of such magnitude does stand out.

I've no doubt either that Ron was hamstrung by the events. I've no doubt that Ron has retained his integrity and honesty. But my doubtlessness is no substitute to a demonstratable general knowledge that his integrity and honesty remains despite his team having been found unable to live up to its responsibilities to such an extent that it merited a heavy penalty for the breach of Article 151C. This process seems to have ensured that we will never be able, for our best efforts, to know that for a fact. Such considerations inevitably raise my concern.

User avatar
mini696
0
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 02:34

Post

Reading the FIA's International Sporting Code I was wondering what happened to these rules.

"152. Penalties : Points should not be deducted separately from drivers and competitors, save in exceptional circumstances."
Where does the FIA get the authority to give the drivers immunity?

"155. Maximum fine given by the stewards of the meeting :
Until further notice, published here or in the Official Bulletin, the maximum fine that shall be inflicted is 50,000 US dollars."

User avatar
Rob W
0
Joined: 18 Aug 2006, 03:28

Post

mini696 wrote:"152. Penalties : Points should not be deducted separately from drivers and competitors, save in exceptional circumstances."
Where does the FIA get the authority to give the drivers immunity?
They have all the authority - they run F1.
mini696 wrote:"155. Maximum fine given by the stewards of the meeting : Until further notice, published here or in the Official Bulletin, the maximum fine that shall be inflicted is 50,000 US dollars."
I think they could be referring to "stewards" of a race-meeting. This was the World Motorsport Council, not a race-meeting.

Rob W

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Post

mini696 wrote:Reading the FIA's International Sporting Code I was wondering what happened to these rules.

"152. Penalties : Points should not be deducted separately from drivers and competitors, save in exceptional circumstances."
Where does the FIA get the authority to give the drivers immunity?
>
Autosport wrote:I would have taken all the points away from Hamilton and Alonso on the grounds that there is a suspicion they had an advantage that they should not have had," said Mosley.
Autosport wrote:....the drivers' contest was left untouched on the grounds that drivers had been assured they would not be punished if they cooperated and provided evidence.
:arrow: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/62451

The FIA are the ultimate authority in motorsports.
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

FLC
FLC
0
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 14:01

Post

Rob W wrote:They might be waiting until it can all be proven in a court to avoid a potential massive employment or slander battle later if they can't. It's only prudent and their lawyers would have advised them of such. He has been suspended from when it was first discovered and not allowed in McLaren's premises.
You mean something like the full statment he gave in the high court of London? The one that's been used by the official Italian authorities and Ferrari? Their Lawyers could do with one third of what's in there. There's nothing prudent about it, maybe solidarity.

Carlos
Carlos
11
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 19:43
Location: Canada

Post

I haven't commented in over 40 pages. Oddly this reminds me of lines in a tragic romantic play; and yes we all have a passion verging on the romantic, well maybe the sentimental certainly the heroic.

" Virtue itself turns to vice, being misapplied; And vice sometimes by action dignified. "

" Go hence, to have more talk of these sad things; Some shall be pardon'd and some punished: For there was never a story of more woe. "

Romeo and Juliet - William Shakespeare
Last edited by Carlos on 17 Sep 2007, 12:49, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Spencifer_Murphy
0
Joined: 11 Apr 2004, 23:29
Location: London, England, UK

Post

Sorry but I feel a long post comming (and a little rant) I'd just like to point out now I am not criticising anybody's personal viewpoint, we are each entilted to our own, and I'm not targeting my post at any individuals. The first part is a genral observation at what I've seen and read, the latter part a rant at this whole debatical. So here goes (*deep breath*)

I must admit that I am very dissappointed with Stepney, Coughlan, Alonso & De La Rosa. There is no disputing that what they did is wrong, and you cannot argue against the penalty given to Mclaren. At the end of the day those four individuals have done something underhand, and although it is just those four individuals Mclaren as a team are responsible for their employee's actions.

I am however very suprised at the vast quantity of anti-mclaren posts on this website claiming the team are cheats. I think everybody is forgetting that THIS SORT OF THING HAPPENS ALL THE TIME, what Mclaren did wrong, is get caught. And you would be very very naive to think Ferrari (and other teams) don't do the same sort of thing.

What seperates this particular case from others is that the information gained by Mclaren was not gained just by their empoylees looking and and/or finding out how the Ferrari works, they had a man on the inside (stepney) providing information.

I also disagree that Mclaren's car - from a design view point - has benifited from the information at all. Of course knowing Kimi's pitstops helps with race strategy, and knowing their weight distribution may teach you a thing or two about what their car is like (understanding the enemy sort of idea if you like) and having a gas to inflate your tyres with to prevent blistering is handy. BUT NONE OF IT, can influence the aerodynamic or mechanical design of this years MP4-22. (but of course it CAN provide an endge on track)

Furthermore, as a result of this point above, how is it that Mclaren have been given such a hefty penalty when cars like the 1995 Ligier (I can't remember the year exactly but I think it was basically a copy of the bennetton from the same year) get no penalty what-so-ever. This point also further proving that espionage in F1 has always happened, is still happening, and will continue to happen.

At the end of the day, what a few Mclaren employees have done was morally wrong, in practice the only thing they did incorrectly (as opposed to wrong - which implies a moral value) was get themselves caught in the act. And what they have done is no worse than what Ferrari, BMW, Toyota and any of the other big name / high budget teams are doing this very moment.

I am NOT saying they do not deserve a penalty - don't do the crime if you can't do the time - they got caught and they deserve to be punished. What I am defending is the accusations that Mclaren have done a dirty dirty thing, almost as if no other team has ever done such a thing, and how dare they for being the first to sink to this new low and taint out sport. Wise up, its a fact of F1 - it happens.

I've seen a few posts also criticising Ron Dennis, some implying that he knew all along and "yeah right, only those four empolyees knew", Ron Dennis loves F1, but first and foremost he values his own integrity, always has done, and always will do. When Ron Dennis tipped off the FIA about the emails and text messages (the only conclusive proof that any wrong doing was done remember) he effectively sealed his teams fate, he would have know that (maybe he hoped he'd recieve a lesser penalty as a result) but for him to do that shows more balls than others in his position, and more honesty, transparacy, intergrity (call it what you will) than most others. IF Bennetton where running illegal traction control in 1994, and if this was done under his nose by his designers, d'you think Flavio would have told Max? No. If you'd seen the interview with Steve Ryder, pre-race, at spa, on ITV's build-up, you'd have seen the look in his face, and the tone in his voice, he's has been hurt by the accusations. Ron's no actor, in fact when he does try to cover up things (Hungary after quali) he does a pretty bad job at it! :lol:

What Ron Dennis did is appludable, and frankly its the only appludable thing that's come of this whole case, which - even more than Mclaren, Ferrari, Stepney, Cloughlan, or who or whatever - has tainted our sport.

Its disgusting that such a relatively minor thing (minor as in it's not unusual - i'm not saying its not wrong - of course its wrong) has cast such a shadow over our sport for so long.

This whole thing has been handled very badly indeed. And its about time we put this behind us, accept that its happened, accept that (in reality) it probably hasn't affected the championship much at all, and if anything BE THANKFUL that if it has given Mclaren any edge at all, it has provided us with one of the most thrilling, entertaining, and damn close championship show-downs that we have had in years! Or have we forgotten the action we've seen on track this year? Lewis' overtaking, Ferando's move on Massa at Nurburgring, Kimi's awe inspiring drive at Spa, Massa's romp home in Turkey. Mathematically four people could win this! Realistically, three people are in with a ver good shot.

This whole thing should NEVER become bigger than the sport. And I'm afraid it may do this. We cannot let that happen. If we do, we are no better than the meddling big-wigs who change rules to artificially "enhance" our sport, we are no better than Stepney or Coughlan, or the cry-baby Ferrari team who alomost every year at Monza complain about their closest championship competitor. (2003, 2006, 2007 are high profile events).

The action is ON TRACK people, lets not forget that.

EDIT: Blimey what a way to hit 900 posts - that was a misson - sorry guys! :oops:
Silence is golden when you don't know a good answer.

Carlos
Carlos
11
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 19:43
Location: Canada

Post

Show me a man walking on water and I'll show you a dozen scuba divers with cameras snapping away- but claiming to photo the fish. If anyone of us has never. I mean never cheated. I'll lend you my best suit to stroll across the waters. Knowing my finest, splendid linen cotton trouser cuffs won't even get damp.
What do you all expect, the teams are made of men, not saints, not gods.
Step outside and compliment a woman. Watch her smile. If she leans close I'm sure your not going to start up on McLaren or Ferrari - unless you lie and tell her you drive one or the other all over this big glamourous earth - of course only thinking of her. Well I hope you don't. Us all be so straight arrow and all and maybe like a little face time.
This will take your mind off this horrible Ferarri/ McLaren thing... or is it a McLaren/Ferrari thing - whatever have it your way & and be sure to order extra fries. Now think of this. I mean really think of this with your full attention and intellect and see if it doesn't distract you from the F/M or M/F situation.
We had our annual pig roast, Americans call it BBQ, the Austrailians a barbie, although here barbie is a plastic pit babe doll for 8 year old girls, did you know that Barbie started as a desk toy for adult men?
In Italy, Yes Italy! The horror, the horror.
A guest ate about 2 kilos of moist, fat dripping roasted pork, drank about 10 beers, 5.5% alki and asked to use *** bathroom to take a - yes a dump and was so drunk he @forgot@ to raise the lid.
Explain how that is possible? Who could be that drunk?
A little OT but I thought you all needed to know what's happening in the real world.
I'm considering hanging a toliet seat on the front as a door knocker.
I demand an explaination of this horrendous event.

User avatar
Rob W
0
Joined: 18 Aug 2006, 03:28

Post

Jean Todt is unhappy with McLaren's punishment. What a surprise - I never saw this coming. :roll:

http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954, ... 26,00.html
"Our main competitor has been recognised, after new evidence, guilty, and has been punished with a soft penalty, losing points for the manufacturers' Championship."

I am of the firm opinion that Todt's comments, going on and on, will actually cause more of Ferrari's previous gripes and unsporting actions to be bought into the daylight once again, and to their detriment. If people like Paul Stoddard, Eddie Irvine, Nigel Stepney have axes to grind about their experiences with Ferrari - which I'm sure they do - they are just going to be encouraged.

(Mika Salo - what did you say about McLaren's pitt stop strategy only a few weeks ago? - that is before you suddenly remembered you'd forgotten what you remembered you forgot - just said after a short chat with your ex-employers :P )

Ferrari's PR efforts are so amateurishly it's not funny.

Rob W

nae
nae
0
Joined: 29 Mar 2006, 00:56

Post

what is the view of the forum on listening into another teams radio traffic ?

(ie going out yer way to get access to a limited medium)

read this and it made me wonder

http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=40734

ferrari cites kimi as a witness to tell that mclaren listen to other teams radio

evil mclaren


'Todt admitted his team did sometimes listen in on rival outfits and that Raikkonen’s evidence proved it was far from an isolated case.

"I have to admit that we listen to certain car radios," he said.'

cuddly ferrari ?

i am somewhat confused

why bring kimi to give evidence to say they all do it in a case when they wanted to paint mclaren blacker than black

so if we all do it is speeding ok?
or isnt it a crime if there is more than one perp

User avatar
NickT
2
Joined: 24 Sep 2003, 12:47
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Post

Thanks Spencifer_Murphy,

Sums up my feelings entirely.
NickT