#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
I think it's just the paint giving that illusion. (a classic answer, I know)hollus wrote:Why are two narrow air inlets each side of the roll hoop preferable to a single thicker inlet in one side only? They clearly are, but to me this looks like extra skin friction, extra carbon fiber, extra backpressure...
What are the upsides?
Perhaps a single intake wouldn't be effective enough in yaw? May also cause a bit of instability rearewards of that areahollus wrote:Why are two narrow air inlets each side of the roll hoop preferable to a single thicker inlet in one side only? They clearly are, but to me this looks like extra skin friction, extra carbon fiber, extra backpressure...
What are the upsides?
I think it may not be that for Mercedes. Last year, W05 used additional air inlets whole season. If they wanted to include those ears to roll hoop, they could have done it easily in my opinion. Maybe, they want to separate the air which goes into those ears.dans79 wrote:they are race specific add-ons, so they are less than optimal. if you modified the roll hoop, you would have to build an entire new chassis, and re-pass all the safety checks, and no one is going to do that for just one race.
As you can see from this shot of the W05 from Australia last year (gotten from the W05 thread), they where molded into the roll hope structure. You can't just change the role hoop area without re taking the safety tests.ismail1991 wrote:I think it may not be that for this situation. Last year, W05 used additional air inlets whole season. If they wanted to include those ears to roll hoop, they could have done it.dans79 wrote:they are race specific add-ons, so they are less than optimal. if you modified the roll hoop, you would have to build an entire new chassis, and re-pass all the safety checks, and no one is going to do that for just one race.