data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f93f/0f93f1d004cbb6b6354374dcceec6460ea5b66cb" alt="Image"
The Elva mentioned above.
A poor translation from my native language, where they are called spooling ports. I think scanvenging is the correct term. And the 10k i once read, many years ago. But i forgot about rc engines.flynfrog wrote:RC engines do 5x that without problems. Im not sure what you mean by mixture spooling. This isn't a term I have heard before.
Edit my motocross engines and karts all do more than 10k RPM I have no idea where you are getting that number from.
this is not across the board number. Its pretty hard for a a 4t engine to rev to 20k and not float the valves. Id be willing to bet a 2t can give a 4t a run for its money at that rpm especially in NA conditions.NL_Fer wrote:A poor translation from my native language, where they are called spooling ports. I think scanvenging is the correct term. And the 10k i once read, many years ago. But i forgot about rc engines.flynfrog wrote:RC engines do 5x that without problems. Im not sure what you mean by mixture spooling. This isn't a term I have heard before.
Edit my motocross engines and karts all do more than 10k RPM I have no idea where you are getting that number from.
Still at 20000 rpm a four stroke is more efficient and modern aluminium blocks are not that heavy anymore. It still a massive weight reduction in diesel trains and ship engines.
Not as "thin" as an N/A 4T 125cc unit - at anywhere near the same specific output, viz: Honda's NR 500/4 G.P. mill..SectorOne wrote:If Motocross bikes are anything to go by, that powerband should be pretty thin![]()
I´ve only ever been scared once while on a vehicle and that was giving a 125cc motocross the full beans.