http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/122395"It is incredibly unlikely that the car will not offer Mercedes a proper challenge.
I think it will be his own.ME4ME wrote:http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/122395"It is incredibly unlikely that the car will not offer Mercedes a proper challenge.
Wonder who's head is going on the block if that isn't the case..
..."Maurizio [Arrivabene, team principal] will tell you we delayed some things to allow for the 2015 car to be finished," said Marchionne.
Hopefully he will not bitch about this. We pushed the start of some of the work on the '16 cars on the chassis, delayed it a bit.
......
hmmm i wonder what kind of suspension Ferrari ran for most of their existance... you got it right a push rod front suspension...so 8 days of running is not enough to set up the type of suspension they have loads of data on? not to count the simulations they can run without getting on the track? pluuuueeeese....FW17 wrote:I think it will be his own.ME4ME wrote:http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/122395"It is incredibly unlikely that the car will not offer Mercedes a proper challenge.
Wonder who's head is going on the block if that isn't the case..
The team will be in for a tough year if they change from pull rod fronts to push rods as 8 days of testing may not be enough to get the system race ready.
If Renault partly bridge the gap they will be in for a tough fight for second in WCC.
Who says 1.5? You're saying they were 1.0 s behind at the end of last year?dans79 wrote:No way they gain 1.5 seconds from any kind aero benefit they might get from the Haas relationship. Just like everyone else they need to gain in the engine department first.
http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/35218416they remained on average 0.6 seconds a lap slower than the champions in qualifying
scroll up the thread and you will see this!f1316 wrote: Who says 1.5? You're saying they were 1.0 s behind at the end of last year?
basti313 wrote:Assuming, that Merc will find 0.5sec over the winter, that would mean they have to find 1.5sec. It would be a dream, but I think it is as unlikely to happen as McLaren-Honda finding 2sec to be competitive.
thats what you call fuzzy match... at the conclusion of last season ferrari were .3 tenths behind on race pace... lets just call it .5tenths...the previous poster claims Mercedes will gain .5tenths from somewhere ..where that number comes from only he knows...dans79 wrote:scroll up the thread and you will see this!f1316 wrote: Who says 1.5? You're saying they were 1.0 s behind at the end of last year?
basti313 wrote:Assuming, that Merc will find 0.5sec over the winter, that would mean they have to find 1.5sec. It would be a dream, but I think it is as unlikely to happen as McLaren-Honda finding 2sec to be competitive.
giantfan10 wrote:thats what you call fuzzy match... at the conclusion of last season ferrari were .3 tenths behind on race pace... lets just call it .5tenths...the previous poster claims Mercedes will gain .5tenths from somewhere ..where that number comes from only he knows...
All we know at this point is that ferrari reconfigured their engine to shrink their rear end to produce more downforce..that alone in theory should wipe out most of the aero deficit they had to Mercedes....now remains to be seen which team improved their Pu more keeping in mind that conventional wisdoms says ferrari has more room for improvement... we shall soon find out though
Yes, I saw that someone wrote that - my point is that I don't know why you'd assume it's correct.dans79 wrote:scroll up the thread and you will see this!f1316 wrote: Who says 1.5? You're saying they were 1.0 s behind at the end of last year?
basti313 wrote:Assuming, that Merc will find 0.5sec over the winter, that would mean they have to find 1.5sec. It would be a dream, but I think it is as unlikely to happen as McLaren-Honda finding 2sec to be competitive.