Or Sepang for that matter (although I would certainly not describe that as a definition of MotoGP) . Phillip Island was one of the best races in motorsport in general I ever saw.SectorOne wrote:Clearly you did not watch the race at SilverstoneClew wrote:I find MotoGP boring
That was the definition of MotoGP right there.
EDIT: oops, forgot to check the dates.
In general, a bike will be very, very quick off the line, but will be hampered in both cornering and top speed.Rainey Fan wrote:I registered for this site specifically to respond to this post because I have a few things to say. I am a fan of both F1 and MotoGP, and enjoy watching most sports with fast cars, bikes, planes (I can't get interested in NASCAR, though). I do follow MotoGP more closely than F1.
First point: Which is faster? A few might say bikes are faster (just like there are those who think global warming doesn't exist), but the lap times speak for themselves. F1 hands down.
Next point: Since it's likely most people on this site, myself included, will never drive a F1 car or ride a MotoGP bike, which is more fun to watch? If Clew finds MotoGP boring, I respect that, but did anyone watch this year's race from Phillip Island? If you didn't think that was exciting, then there's not much more I can say.
Last point: What do you have the economic means to ride/drive? Is it closer in performance to an F1 car or a Moto GP bike? I ride a 2000 Yamaha R1 and I drive a 2010 Mazda 3. I know the Mazda isn't a true performance car, but I will never afford a Ferrari, Lamborghini, McLaren, etc. Let's look at some at some comparisons of pounds per HP. I'll use my son's RSX-S instead of my Mazda; although it's no Porsche or Vette, it's still a fair assessment of an average guy's car. Based on the (very rough) weight and HP figures I looked up:
RSX-S - 14.4 lbs/HP
R1 with rider - 3.8 lbs/HP
F1 with driver - 1.7 lbs/HP
MotoGP with rider - 1.9 lbs/HP
As you can see, the average guy can get a lot closer to the performance of a race machine on a bike than in a car (if you take the time to build your skills). Yes, my son's RSX-S can probably corner harder than I can, but accelerating out of the corners or on a straight, I'd be gone. I always say: To own a fast car you need a lot of money and a reasonable amount of skill. To own a fast bike you need a lot of skill and a reasonable amount of money. And by the way, for my bike I paid half what my son paid for his Acura.
Concering cost efficiency, well yes: you'll get more bang for each euro/dollar you spend on a bike. However, I think both F1 and MotoGP are sports where money matters little at the top teams.
But again, concerning entertainment MotoGP will win anyday.