Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
bhall II
bhall II
477
Joined: 19 Jun 2014, 20:15

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

Pilatus wrote:SF-15 had steering rod integrated with the upper wishbone:

[...]

Hence the thicker member.
Stiffnes wasn't an issue. :mrgreen:
F2008 also had integrated steering arms.

Image

Image

It's obviously inconclusive, and my installation stiffness theory is just that: a (possibly harebrained) theory. I've spelled out in more detail here if you're interested, though.

User avatar
superdowg316
2
Joined: 01 Jul 2014, 10:19
Location: 'Straya

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

TzeiTzei wrote:Is there any logic behind the way Ferrari names their cars?
For a while back in the Schumi era the cars has an F then the year of creation in it, like F2002 and F2004, which was nice and simple, but since then it's been all over the shop (2008: F2008, 2009: F60, 2010: F10, 2011: 150° Italia, 2012: F2012, 2013: F138, 2014: F14 T, 2015: SF15-T)
Friendship with Honda ended, Renault is my new (and more reliable) friend.

denisjp
denisjp
4
Joined: 01 Dec 2015, 17:55

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

superdowg316 wrote:
TzeiTzei wrote:Is there any logic behind the way Ferrari names their cars?
For a while back in the Schumi era the cars has an F then the year of creation in it, like F2002 and F2004, which was nice and simple, but since then it's been all over the shop (2008: F2008, 2009: F60, 2010: F10, 2011: 150° Italia, 2012: F2012, 2013: F138, 2014: F14 T, 2015: SF15-T)
-F60 (2009) because it was 60th Ferrari built for Formula 1;
-F10 (2010) I don't really know why they did drop the 20×× thing;
-F150°Italia (2011) because it was the 150th anniversary of Unity of Italy. At first it was just F150, but Ford complained because they have a pick-up with that name;
-F138 (2013) because it was the last mounting a V8 engine and 13 stands fore the year;
-F14-T (2014) was chosen by a poll. 14 cor the year and T for turbo. It oddly resembles FIAT (marketing?);
-SF15-T (2015) because they wanted to give a sense of detachement from the recent past, the beginning of something new. It stands for Scuderia Ferrari 2015 Turbo.

denisjp
denisjp
4
Joined: 01 Dec 2015, 17:55

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

superdowg316 wrote:
TzeiTzei wrote:Is there any logic behind the way Ferrari names their cars?
For a while back in the Schumi era the cars has an F then the year of creation in it, like F2002 and F2004, which was nice and simple, but since then it's been all over the shop (2008: F2008, 2009: F60, 2010: F10, 2011: 150° Italia, 2012: F2012, 2013: F138, 2014: F14 T, 2015: SF15-T)
-F60 (2009) because it was 60th Ferrari built for Formula 1;
-F10 (2010) I don't really know why they did drop the 20×× thing;
-F150°Italia (2011) because it was the 150th anniversary of Unity of Italy. At first it was just F150, but Ford complained because they have a pick-up with that name;
-F138 (2013) because it was the last mounting a V8 engine and 13 stands fore the year;
-F14-T (2014) was chosen by a poll. 14 cor the year and T for turbo. It oddly resembles FIAT (marketing?);
-SF15-T (2015) because they wanted to give a sense of detachement from the recent past, the beginning of something new. It stands for Scuderia Ferrari 2015 Turbo.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

The name via public vote nowadays.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

Sevach
Sevach
1081
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

If it was up to me...
166 TH 3.

Sadly i'm not in charge.

BanMeToo
BanMeToo
6
Joined: 27 Dec 2013, 16:26
Location: USA

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

Agree. Wasn't one of the 2014 poll options more or less in that convention? I voted for that one.

denisjp
denisjp
4
Joined: 01 Dec 2015, 17:55

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

There were F166 Turbo(second in the poll with 32% preferences vs 33% of F14-T), F14 Scuderia and F616

BanMeToo
BanMeToo
6
Joined: 27 Dec 2013, 16:26
Location: USA

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

That close, were we. It seems to me like the unwashed masses enjoyed voting for F14-T only because "FIAT"...... but maybe that's just my distorted worldview.

GoranF1
GoranF1
155
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 12:53
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

Is it a smart move to change the philosopy of chassis geometry whit new front suspension and to change an PU construction philosopy to make it more compact, from a very good package that Ferrari has whit 2015 car?
It sounds to me that Ferrari will take another risk whit this like in the past...2009(bad)-2010(very good)-2011(disaster)-2012(if not for Alonso disaster again)-2013(solid)-2014(disaster)-2015(very good)
I understand the risk could pay off but knowing Ferrari it may well go in the other way.
"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication & competence."

User avatar
ME4ME
79
Joined: 19 Dec 2014, 16:37

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

Even if Mercedes would use the W06 next year, Ferrari would have to improve quite substantially to challenge for the WCC. Mercedes obviously won't stand still, they will develop their car.

Ferrari has no choice, they must make big gains over the winter. With Allison in charge of the technical team and with a turn-around in culture, hopefully they can be bold without losing touch of reality.

wickedz50
wickedz50
0
Joined: 27 Aug 2013, 08:32

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

ME4ME wrote:Even if Mercedes would use the W06 next year, Ferrari would have to improve quite substantially to challenge for the WCC. Mercedes obviously won't stand still, they will develop their car.

Ferrari has no choice, they must make big gains over the winter. With Allison in charge of the technical team and with a turn-around in culture, hopefully they can be bold without losing touch of reality.
I reckon this is James Allison's 3rd year with Ferrari so fans will be expecting something special on the chasis and aero. I can humbly say that Ferrari will improve. A deficit of 250 points cannot be gained over just one winter alone but if they have worked through 2015 continuing from 2014 winter then definitely there is a fight on hand in 2016. I just hope that the HAAS partnership has worked with whatever Ferrari could take from HAAS resources.

User avatar
Gridlock
30
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

denisjp wrote:-SF15-T (2015) because they wanted to give a sense of detachement from the recent past, the beginning of something new. It stands for Scuderia Ferrari 2015 Turbo.
I'm fairly sure they simply didn't want to the car to be 'the fist'
#58

mika vs michael
mika vs michael
-1
Joined: 27 Jan 2007, 01:35

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

My opinion is that Ferrari will mount a serious challenge a la 1998 or 1997 but in the end will lose to the wire because the gap with Mercedes in 2015 was around .750 -.500 at best. So next year I believe it will go down to .250 - 0.
But if we add the Haas parameter in the equation maybe the gap can be bridged. You all know what I mean...
I am 99% sure that Ferrari went that road... exploited the loophole regarding haas team and gained additional data from the windtunnel work.
Let's wait and see.
"It is necessary to relax your muscles when you can. Relaxing your brain is fatal." Stirling Moss

I tried this and I had understeer, I tried that and I had oversteer, at the end of the corner I just run out of talent

User avatar
SectorOne
166
Joined: 26 May 2013, 09:51

Re: Ferrari 667 Speculation Thread

Post

i can honestly say i would not be surprised to see four 2016 Ferrari´s next year, two of the branded as HAAS cars.
Due to some weird regulation loop hole Ferrari managed to find.

It´s not impossible, i mean Mercedes went testing with a 2013 car and got out of it clean.

edit: down-vote-nerds are out again. Hide your kids, hide your wife.
Last edited by SectorOne on 18 Dec 2015, 21:14, edited 1 time in total.
"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother that person is a piece of sh*t"