Without prognosticating too much, a crash test pass this early perhaps suggests not much evolution in the car (which is over 2 years old at this point) and another year with a significant performance delta, even with a Vito lump in the back?NathanOlder wrote:Nice to see them pass the crash test by mid Jan. Looking hopeful for the firat test now. Hope they make the jump to catch Sauber & Co.
Depends on whether MR04 is a clean-sheet design or not, if not then yes we're talking about a 2-year-old design being updated for '16 and thus passing the tests easily/early, as a known quantity. As with most posts here in January though the only fully correct answer is 'wait for February'nevill3 wrote:I thought that once they decided to not launch a new car half way through last year they would have switched their focus to this years car, hence the early passing of the crash tests, rather than just using a "two year old car" as mentioned in an earlier post.
Both. They used the McLaren wind tunnel (and assume they still do). In mid-April, they were attempting to reassemble the 2015 model that was sold at auction. I don't know at what point they decided to cut their losses on 2015 and focus on 2016. There are thousands of parts to be printed in order to assemble a whole model in addition to the spine. They did over 250 boxes of 3D printed parts for the MR03, each of which contained probably a dozen pieces as a bare minimum...denisjp wrote:Does Manor use a wind-tunnel, or just the CFD?
MrCelroy wrote:According to this article, the new chassis designation will be called "MRT" :
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/spo ... 39762.html
(4th paragraph)
Didn't we already know this*?Facts Only wrote:Yeah but they'll be able to build the car from an old forklift and the contents of a shed.