Gas in tires

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
Militia Est Vita
0
Joined: 11 Jun 2007, 15:26
Location: Mexico

Post

But I heard somewhere once (I think a Discovery channel Williams F1 dvd that I bought for 5 bucks) that Bridgestone or Michellin (back in the Michellin days) inflates tires for the teams and then they deliver the tires for the teams, is that incorrect? Or if it is not, does teams have specifications on what or how should Bridgeston set up their tires before they are delivered to the team? Or is it just now that teams receive the rubber and they are in charge of the whole process.

ss_collins
ss_collins
0
Joined: 31 Oct 2006, 15:59

Post

There are have been endless debates on what exotic gas Ferrari could be using. There were even reports that they may be using Argon, but the gas is just too exotic. Helium might also be a good candidate.
I suggest the Dec issue will firmly settle these debates... and result in some interesting r&d projects.

frankly I've looked over all the forums and nobody has even come close to the real situation.

We are going to set up a method for non subscribers to buy the single issue at a discount so you can find it all out.

segedunum
segedunum
0
Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 13:49

Post

flynfrog wrote:i can buy a bottle of argon down the street for welding its neither rare nor expensive
It's a probably bit much to be filling all your tyres with at every race and every test unless there was some serious advantage to it - that's the point - although it is reasonably available via industrial processes. A more general purpose gas would be more suitable. However, it does have some interesting properties, such as low thermal conductivity.

User avatar
Scuderia_Russ
0
Joined: 17 Jan 2004, 22:24
Location: Motorsport Valley, England.

Post

Militia Est Vita wrote:But I heard somewhere once (I think a Discovery channel Williams F1 dvd that I bought for 5 bucks) that Bridgestone or Michellin (back in the Michellin days) inflates tires for the teams and then they deliver the tires for the teams, is that incorrect? Or if it is not, does teams have specifications on what or how should Bridgeston set up their tires before they are delivered to the team? Or is it just now that teams receive the rubber and they are in charge of the whole process.
When we have new tyres fitted they are overinflated by the tyre company. (in our championships this is usually Avon / B.M.T.R.) to around twenty five p.s.i. then delivered to us where they are then reduced to our desired pressures.
"Whether you think you can or can't, either way you are right."
-Henry Ford-

User avatar
Militia Est Vita
0
Joined: 11 Jun 2007, 15:26
Location: Mexico

Post

Thanx for the info Russ! So I guess F1 follows a similar procedure with Bridgestone.

A more technical question then would be if tyres can be inflated with a mixture of 2 different gases? I'm no chemist but maybe density of 2 gases inside 1 single tire would have disastrous effects on tyres?

User avatar
Ciro Pabón
106
Joined: 11 May 2005, 00:31

Post

Why would be disastrous to have several gases inside your tire? Guess what air is made off. Yeap, you got it: air is a mixture of several gases.

About the teaser by ss_collins, allright, you have to live, but could you point us to the misterious condition special gas in tires is worth for? I'm tired of people selling snake oil with this subject.

As for my attention span, I hardly can keep myself commited to a subject for a week; you, trying to keep the suspense until December is inhuman. If you know, nobody else does, and you don't post, well... why I am thinking this is taking unfair advantage of the forum? :)
Ciro

Carlos
Carlos
11
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 19:43
Location: Canada

Post

Will definitely result in a revolution for balloon animals :wink:

ss_collins
ss_collins
0
Joined: 31 Oct 2006, 15:59

Post

definatley not snake oil.. but the full details will be out in the Dec issue of RCE - thats about four weeks from now. Its so obvious once you know, utter mystery when you don't

Mikey_s
Mikey_s
8
Joined: 21 Dec 2005, 11:06

Post

Ciro, and others,

I subscribe to RCE and I will save you the cost of an issue when the article appears... without breaking copyright I will reval all of the details that are reported!

By copy to sscollins; I have a large degree of sympathy with Ciro's comments. Recognising that you are the editor (proprietor?) of a commercial entity I am somewhat disappointed at this piece of shameless self promotion on a forum which thrives as a result of many knowledgeable people contributing their expertise free, gratis and for nothing.

Whilst I recognise that you have a living to make I hope that your 'hype' is justified by the content of the December issue - otherwise you do risk alienating a lot of people.

By copy to Tomba; the posts by sscollins contribute nothing to the discussion thread and are simply commercial advertising which, unlike the banner heading (which is presumably paid for) are placed for free.. Any chance they could be removed?
Mike

segedunum
segedunum
0
Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 13:49

Post

Ciro Pabón wrote:As for my attention span, I hardly can keep myself commited to a subject for a week; you, trying to keep the suspense until December is inhuman. If you know, nobody else does, and you don't post, well... why I am thinking this is taking unfair advantage of the forum? :)
Have to agree really. There are only so many combinations, and of course, there is the possibility that what Ferrari is doing is not so spectacular after all. There's not much suspense in it at all.

User avatar
syguy
0
Joined: 22 Feb 2007, 04:06
Location: USA

Time to Brainstorm

Post

ss_collins wrote:Its so obvious once you know
Ok let's try brainstorming. According to Wikipedia "Brainstorming is a group creativity technique designed to generate a large number of ideas for the solution to a problem." We have the prerequisite group with creativity to spare.

Let's put down every possible idea - no matter how wacky. Sherlock Holmes once said, "Once you eliminate the impossible whatever's left, no matter how implausible, must be the answer" - or something like that.

Here goes:

1) Remove the onboard store of CO2 fire-extinguisher by sourcing CO2 from the tires.
2) Store CO2 to retard global warming.
3) 3 (CO2) molecules are always better than 2 (N2).
4) CO2 canisters for Sodastreams are cheaper than N2 when bought in bulk.
4) Bicyclists use small hand held CO2 canister pumps, great for fine adjustment of tire pressure without trailing a heavy N2 canister around.
5) Over to you…

Maybe ss_collins can play along and give temperature grades based on how close we are :)

In the interest of full disclosure - I admit to reading Racecar Engineering and enjoy it.
Symscape, Computer-Aided Engineering for all

User avatar
checkered
0
Joined: 02 Mar 2007, 14:32

Post

Well, there's a

slight correlation in developments that might have something to do with the applications of tyre gas(es). Both Ferrari and Toyota use BBS wheels, Ferrari pioneered the wheel fairings, especially the front ones, and Toyota was relatively quick to follow with an almost identical arrangement. Might this have something to do with a development that doesn't quite meet the eye?

ss_collins
ss_collins
0
Joined: 31 Oct 2006, 15:59

Post

Well we are going to make th issue available to buy online (prob at a discount for F1T readers)

Is it worth it - well the FIA didn't know about it and I've had an F1 team on the phone today asking to find out about it. It will open some new considerations about this years F1 cars. We are pretty certain that McLaren never knew the full story...

As to the hot and cold thing well most of you are positively arctic... but some have warmed up a little. The wait should be over sooner than I said - we will put thhe web copies up as soon as we get them (about a week before they go on sale in Europe and three before the USA)

I may have copies with me at the Global Motorsport Congress in Cologne in the second week of November...

I'd love to tell you guys but I wouldn't have a job if I did...

But I'm suprised more of you have not picked up on the Laurel Hill tunnel stuff we ran two months ago - I'll send it to the owner of this site when I have time so you all can read it along with a load of other F1 content...

I'd like to think I share as much as I can normally (Spyker pics???)

User avatar
megz
1
Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 09:57
Location: New Zealand

Post

Militia Est Vita wrote:A more technical question then would be if tyres can be inflated with a mixture of 2 different gases? I'm no chemist but maybe density of 2 gases inside 1 single tire would have disastrous effects on tyres?
Now that COULD actually have a devastating effect on performance especially if the gases weighed far different amounts

I.e. Molecular weight of Co2 (Carbon Dioxide)
C*2(O) = Molecular weight, where C=12 and O=16
44

Molecular weight of Helium (He2) (Lighter than air, would allow for extra ballast would it not?)
2*He= Molecular Weight
2*4 = 8

(Molecular weight is the Atomic masses of all elements in a molecule added together)

I'd explain what a mol is but to be perfectly honest, if forgotten.... HAHA im a terrible Chem student.

Now weight saving would go to Helium, not sure of the specific heat capacity of the two molecules.

User avatar
Ciro Pabón
106
Joined: 11 May 2005, 00:31

Post

I quote, from a thread we had on the possibility of making the car lighter using helium inside the tyres:

viewtopic.php?t=2680
The permeation rates of hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen in rubber on a vacuum (you really can find anything on the Web) are 2.2, 2.0 and 0.53 (all expressed in 10^-8 square cm/sec). This means than on a rubber container, oxygen is 4 times more prone to diffusion than nytrogen and helium is just marginally (10%) harder to contain than oxygen. This is an approximation, as I understand that this is measured with vacuum at the other "side" of the rubber being tested.[/b]
And also:
"Reca pointed out in a different thread that air density is 0.0012 g/cm3, a tenth of what I used. Thus, the weight of air in all the tires is a mere 840 grams. This gaves you very little mass advantage and a really small lift if you substitute for helium, then"
Finally, I don't know why I have been forced to say twice that air is a mixture of gases. Nobody seems terrified by filling his tires with air... :)

A mol is a bunch of molecules (602.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 molecules, I think).
Ciro