#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
more scary would be to be able to read ALO's mind atm.Thunders wrote:Lap Count at Lunch Break:
Rosberg (81), Alonso (70), Verstappen (59), Ricciardo (58), Bottas (54), Ericsson (49), Perez (48), Vettel (45), Palmer (41), Wehrlein (36), Gutierrez (31)
Scary to see Alonso up there.
He'll probably be agitated he wasn't able to run more, having to prove a point from last year . Still early days though; last year at the end of the season they were also able to run around 2-4 race distances with each engine. Problem is each engine needs to able to run 4 race weekends, which is I believe around 12 race distances.FrukostScones wrote:more scary would be to be able to read ALO's mind atm.Thunders wrote:Lap Count at Lunch Break:
Rosberg (81), Alonso (70), Verstappen (59), Ricciardo (58), Bottas (54), Ericsson (49), Perez (48), Vettel (45), Palmer (41), Wehrlein (36), Gutierrez (31)
Scary to see Alonso up there.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Im hearing more and more positive thing's about the car now, I think with the solid running so far that will give us a great foundation to push on into next week and get some good updates onto the car along with those already in the pipeline. Before McLaren couldn't even do the Aero testing like this last year, very positive imo.Thunders wrote:If the Correlation is as exact as Boullier mentioned it to be i don't think you need to push Laptimes when it doesn't fit your Program. You basically get a very good glimpse of what the Car can do in the Simulator. That should be enough for Fernando, if his 2016 drive was ever in question (wich i still doubt).
Rosberg did it on softs.f1316 wrote: I think Mercedes did a similar time to Vettel's on the medium last year, so still some way to go.