F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
Lucky
Lucky
157
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 09:23

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

Image

ferkan
ferkan
31
Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 20:50

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

willmesquita wrote:
godlameroso wrote:14 kmh down, they need to cut that deficit to a third of that.
17...and I am a bit sad with this gap.
Yea, I just think Honda will get on top of the problems they seem to have judging by every other series they have been to. Putting young engineers to design V8 is something entirely different to designing these beasts.

ChrisF1
ChrisF1
7
Joined: 28 Feb 2013, 21:48

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

Dare we point out that the Williams was consistently faster in a straight line than the Mercedes, but was not a better car?

Or should I point to "This is testing and people are keeping their cards close to their chest"

I'm not confident either way, but I wouldn't be making judgements already.

User avatar
Gridlock
30
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

As I understand it this isn't the 2016 engine anyway, just bits of it, so it might as well be going 450kph for all it matters.
#58

User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

Problems with McLaren right now, its seems that was some smoke....51 laps its not a disaster but today is not being such a good day.

ferkan
ferkan
31
Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 20:50

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

ChrisF1 wrote:Dare we point out that the Williams was consistently faster in a straight line than the Mercedes, but was not a better car?

Or should I point to "This is testing and people are keeping their cards close to their chest"

I'm not confident either way, but I wouldn't be making judgements already.
They will be ~2 seconds of the pace in Melbourne qualis me thinks.

User avatar
gandharva
252
Joined: 06 Feb 2012, 15:19
Location: Munich

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

Are there more detailed speed trap/gps numbers? I couldn't find anything so far...

Lucky
Lucky
157
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 09:23

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

Image

User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

AMuS thinks it was a Hydraulic Leak. https://twitter.com/tgruener/status/702503868266053632
turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

dot235
dot235
2
Joined: 11 Feb 2016, 11:59

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

ferkan wrote:
ChrisF1 wrote:Dare we point out that the Williams was consistently faster in a straight line than the Mercedes, but was not a better car?

Or should I point to "This is testing and people are keeping their cards close to their chest"

I'm not confident either way, but I wouldn't be making judgements already.
They will be ~2 seconds of the pace in Melbourne qualis me thinks.
Me agrees. Sounds about right all things considered.

Silent Storm
Silent Storm
111
Joined: 02 Feb 2015, 18:42

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

"Up at Turns 1-3 again. Interesting watching Sainz chase Hamilton with both on the medium tyre. Sainz has gradually lost ground and doesn't accelerate as well out of Turn 2 but otherwise the STR again looks a decent chassis.

There is not much to choose between them on corner entry, though the Merc is obviously travelling a bit faster when it gets there...

The works Merc and Ferrari are noticeably faster than others under acceleration up the hill from Turn 1 to Turn 3, but it's difficult to split them. The 2015 Ferrari engined STR is next best, a step ahead of the works Renault and the similarly-powered Red Bull RB12"
Ben Anderson

From Autosport.
The cheapest sort of pride is national pride, every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.

ChrisDanger
ChrisDanger
26
Joined: 30 Mar 2011, 09:59

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

Does anyone know what "mishap" was referred to by the below? https://twitter.com/F1/status/702503253276119045

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

Crashing into the gravel trap I'd imagine.

User avatar
Gridlock
30
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

He tried going into a corner back end first.
#58

dot235
dot235
2
Joined: 11 Feb 2016, 11:59

Re: F1 2016 pre-season testing

Post

Silent Storm wrote:"Up at Turns 1-3 again. Interesting watching Sainz chase Hamilton with both on the medium tyre. Sainz has gradually lost ground and doesn't accelerate as well out of Turn 2 but otherwise the STR again looks a decent chassis.

There is not much to choose between them on corner entry, though the Merc is obviously travelling a bit faster when it gets there...

The works Merc and Ferrari are noticeably faster than others under acceleration up the hill from Turn 1 to Turn 3, but it's difficult to split them. The 2015 Ferrari engined STR is next best, a step ahead of the works Renault and the similarly-powered Red Bull RB12"
Ben Anderson

From Autosport.


Very interesting. So can we safely conclude that 2015 Ferrari EPU is quite substantially more powerful than 2016 Renault EPU?
I'am quite surprised if that's the case, considering the very decent 2014 season they had. Was expecting 2015 to be a temporary setback for them. But to be genuinely behind by more than 1 year in engine development is no joke.

I'am sure that can't be true, but how it looks like, is that 2016 EPU is barely if any better than their 2014 EPU.