So 7-14kph better than last year, with new upgraded engine for Melbourne it might be cut down a bit and it might be comparable to RenaultLucky wrote:Button: 270 S1 267 S2 276 S3 317 Speed Trap.
Best: 278 S1 274 S2 286 S3 334 Speed Trap.
So 7-14kph better than last year, with new upgraded engine for Melbourne it might be cut down a bit and it might be comparable to RenaultLucky wrote:Button: 270 S1 267 S2 276 S3 317 Speed Trap.
Best: 278 S1 274 S2 286 S3 334 Speed Trap.
Hmm. We're not too far away from being halfway through testing. I'm not seeing anything from the Mclaren to suggest that it's anything but a bottom half of the field car. They might sort the engine out and get more power come australia. They might have a good chassis but challenging for podiums? Not on what we've seen. Now we've had the first engine blow out too. This all feels very familiar. For sure, they've managed more laps this year but I don't have confidence in them at all.Alonsofor2017 wrote:So 7-14kph better than last year, with new upgraded engine for Melbourne it might be cut down a bit and it might be comparable to RenaultLucky wrote:Button: 270 S1 267 S2 276 S3 317 Speed Trap.
Best: 278 S1 274 S2 286 S3 334 Speed Trap.
bonjon1979 wrote:
Hmm. We're not too far away from being halfway through testing. I'm not seeing anything from the Mclaren to suggest that it's anything but a bottom half of the field car. They might sort the engine out and get more power come australia. They might have a good chassis but challenging for podiums? Not on what we've seen. Now we've had the first engine blow out too. This all feels very familiar. For sure, they've managed more laps this year but I don't have confidence in them at all.
I think there will be evos and power gains but those grid penalties will hurt.PABLOEING wrote:very bad news today about honda 2016 engine.......no power and the worst......no new evolutions in the near future.
FrukostScones wrote:I think there will be evos and power gains but those grid penalties will hurt.PABLOEING wrote:very bad news today about honda 2016 engine.......no power and the worst......no new evolutions in the near future.
I'm not sure why you find that funny. I see nothing from the 31 to suggest it is ahead ofringo wrote:bonjon1979 wrote:
Hmm. We're not too far away from being halfway through testing. I'm not seeing anything from the Mclaren to suggest that it's anything but a bottom half of the field car. They might sort the engine out and get more power come australia. They might have a good chassis but challenging for podiums? Not on what we've seen. Now we've had the first engine blow out too. This all feels very familiar. For sure, they've managed more laps this year but I don't have confidence in them at all.
But i wouldn't pressure them too much. The first thing Ron said was that they will get points initially. Which means appearing in Q3. I think this car can make an appearance in Q3 a few times. So lets start from there then see if they can steal a podium in a high attrition race.
They had tokens last year too. What we seem to be seeing is that these engines are very hard to turn around when there's a problem. We have rumours of different engines designed by different engineers in Honda, so we may see a different story when the 'Melbourne spec' engine arrives but I shan't hold my breath.McG wrote:FrukostScones wrote:I think there will be evos and power gains but those grid penalties will hurt.PABLOEING wrote:very bad news today about honda 2016 engine.......no power and the worst......no new evolutions in the near future.
And don't they have development tokens for the season? And isn't there over half of testing still to go?