Thoughts on this...
http://en.f1i.com/news/55979-honda-expl ... spend.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyEOOXbshQcR_Redding wrote:..?..godlameroso wrote:When they say plasma, they mean boosting a conventional spark plug with a capacitor. It's an old hot rodder trick.
This is the Mahle quote in full............
""this results in the formation of plasma jets that reach the piston primarily at the outer edge and ignite the remainder of the mixture. While ignition normally takes place in the centre of the cylinder, with Mahle Jet Ignition it essentially takes place from the outside toward the inside. This allows significantly better combustion of the fuel mixture. The result: more power with considerably less residue.""
They are referring to hot plasma jets,formed by passing through the annular holes in the bottom of the pre chamber, squirting into the main volume and igniting that charge.
A flame (from Latin flamma) is the visible, gaseous part of a fire. It is caused by a highly exothermic reaction taking place in a thin zone. Very hot flames are hot enough to have ionized gaseous components of sufficient density to be considered plasma.
The primary source of "ignition" is a simple spark plug. Even if the jets are "plasma" the pre-chamber doesn't do anything special to the charge within, it simply burns like any other SI engine.R_Redding wrote:5.11.1 ~ The use of Plasma , Laser , or other high frequency ignition techniques is forbidden.
From the Mahle text...
"this results in the formation of plasma jets that reach the piston primarily at the outer edge and ignite the remainder of the mixture."
So.. If the Mahle system is igniting the main charge with plasma jets .... Is it Legal ?.
Plasma is the fourth state of matter (the other three being solid, liquid and gas). Plasma is similar to gas, but with free electrons which makes is electrically conductive. A gas that is heated to a high temperature or subjected to a high magnetic field can become a plasma.PlatinumZealot wrote:Some people are confusing how the term plasma is applied. One could argue that fire is a form of plasma yes but it very iffy.. When the people say plasma ignition they are refering to method of using a highly charged electrode that makes a strong arc that gas is passed over. The gas gets extemely hot and also electricaly charged. The gas is generally non reacting usually an innert gas. You can blow the gas into the chamber from there.. This does not happen in the TJI system. The TJI spark plug is a typical spark plug that ignites a stationary mixture of fuel and air... There is no gas passing over the arc and there is actaul combustion. Fire.
Anyway i have said this once and i will sya it again. There is a two injector loop hole. The rules as written only constrain one direct injector and that all fuel must be delivered between intake and exhaust valve. This is clear opening to implement an aditional indirect injector in the pre chamber.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indirect_injection
Maybe.PlatinumZealot wrote:
Anyway i have said this once and i will sya it again. There is a two injector loop hole. The rules as written only constrain one direct injector and that all fuel must be delivered between intake and exhaust valve. This is clear opening to implement an aditional indirect injector in the pre chamber.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indirect_injection
Would a single injector with 2 controllable nozzles be legal? One would obviously need to be piped into the main combustion chamber.Brian Coat wrote: Maybe.
This is a plausible enough line to take and certainly worth a go, but the FIA could argue that you are applying a diesel engine definition of indirect injection to a gasoline engine. In gasoline engines indirect injection usually refers to an injector upstream of the intake valve, as described in the Wikipedia link you posted. You could respectfully counter-argue that they are confusing what they meant with the rule that they wrote, which is open to at least two perfectly legitimate interpretations.
So it might be legal or they might have a single injector system that works.
Now you blur the lines between what is considered a single injector or two...djos wrote:Would a single injector with 2 controllable nozzles be legal? One would obviously need to be piped into the main combustion chamber.Brian Coat wrote: Maybe.
This is a plausible enough line to take and certainly worth a go, but the FIA could argue that you are applying a diesel engine definition of indirect injection to a gasoline engine. In gasoline engines indirect injection usually refers to an injector upstream of the intake valve, as described in the Wikipedia link you posted. You could respectfully counter-argue that they are confusing what they meant with the rule that they wrote, which is open to at least two perfectly legitimate interpretations.
So it might be legal or they might have a single injector system that works.
Yeah that's the sort of thing I was wondering about, it'd be great if the FiA would publish tech drawings of approved parts wouldnt it.PlatinumZealot wrote: Now you blur the lines between what is considered a single injector or two...
Taking a stab at it, I think that one injector may have multiple nozzles but it can only have a single plunger going to all those nozzles. Even still, it should be possible to design the side branch injector using one pintle. Using a two or three stage stage plunger perhaps.