Here are the size of 2017 tyres. Feel free to delete this topic if it's not necessary
The front doesn't look to be as wide as it could be.ctdrftna wrote:That car is at the 2017 track width. The wings were roughly modified to size but not representative of what a 2017 wing will look like.
It would require a redesign of the suspension and adjustments to the aero.Scorpaguy wrote:While I like the "retro" aspect of these "barn doors" (an old AJ Foyt reference to wide rubber)...I think its time the pinnacle of motorsport evolves to low profile type tires.
Formula E's spec tire has been successful and makes for some interesting yaw at times...and looks good. Also, I see little prospect for broad usage of such wide rubber in the future of automotive activities.
However, I suspect the cost of a total redesign of the car (likely required by low profiles) will keep us on 1960's profiled rubber fore some time.
See this thing never ends, everyone asks for retro low slung cars with hugeee rear tires, and they give you, and in return you say they look sillySectorOne wrote:The rear tires are so wide it almost looks silly.
Should be interesting seeing how much faster the cars are gonna be out of corners (hairpins like Montreal before back straight for example) with so much more rubber to deal with the power.
You should read more slowly Samraj. It makes you skip words when you hurry through sentences.Samraj_official wrote:See this thing never ends, everyone asks for retro low slung cars with hugeee rear tires, and they give you, and in return you say they look sillySectorOne wrote:The rear tires are so wide it almost looks silly.
Should be interesting seeing how much faster the cars are gonna be out of corners (hairpins like Montreal before back straight for example) with so much more rubber to deal with the power.