2017-2020 Aerodynamic Regulations Thread

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
Manoah2u
Manoah2u
61
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 14:07

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

Pierce89 wrote:
Manoah2u wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjyDypVUgAA8OD9.jpg:large

front tires too wide, rear tires too narrow.
If you're stuck in the 80's or if you're into drag racing, maybe, but I love the look of huge aggressive meats at each corner.
you completely fail to understand the point.

the image is not even close to what it looks like in 2017. the front tires on this image are too wide and the rear tires too narrow.
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

Holm86 wrote:
godlameroso wrote:Anyone think we'll see shorter wheelbase cars? Now that the diffuser is more efficient, and the floor is bigger, and the wider track and tires. At the very least the new proportions of the cars are going to make them look shorter than this year. Or will we still see cars that look like cigarette boats?
Unfortunately not, but I would have wished that the new regulations would have shortened the wheelbase too. IMO the cars are way too long, it looks stupid, and I also think a shorter car would be more twitchy and harder to drive, which is what we are all looking for.
I heard Alonso some months ago stating current cars are way too long, but he said they´re so long they´re too dificult to control when sliding.

It was a very surprising statement to me, as I also was conviced that would make them easier to master, but looks like I was wrong, he was asking for shorter cars so they can slide easier than today

Henk
Henk
1
Joined: 19 May 2015, 13:22

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

Andres125sx wrote:
Holm86 wrote:
godlameroso wrote:Anyone think we'll see shorter wheelbase cars? Now that the diffuser is more efficient, and the floor is bigger, and the wider track and tires. At the very least the new proportions of the cars are going to make them look shorter than this year. Or will we still see cars that look like cigarette boats?
Unfortunately not, but I would have wished that the new regulations would have shortened the wheelbase too. IMO the cars are way too long, it looks stupid, and I also think a shorter car would be more twitchy and harder to drive, which is what we are all looking for.
I heard Alonso some months ago stating current cars are way too long, but he said they´re so long they´re too dificult to control when sliding.

It was a very surprising statement to me, as I also was conviced that would make them easier to master, but looks like I was wrong, he was asking for shorter cars so they can slide easier than today
I think it's a tradeoff. Shorter cars can be controlled while sliding while longer cars don't slide but when they do you're gone.

User avatar
Holm86
247
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

Henk wrote:
Andres125sx wrote:
Holm86 wrote:
Unfortunately not, but I would have wished that the new regulations would have shortened the wheelbase too. IMO the cars are way too long, it looks stupid, and I also think a shorter car would be more twitchy and harder to drive, which is what we are all looking for.
I heard Alonso some months ago stating current cars are way too long, but he said they´re so long they´re too dificult to control when sliding.

It was a very surprising statement to me, as I also was conviced that would make them easier to master, but looks like I was wrong, he was asking for shorter cars so they can slide easier than today
I think it's a tradeoff. Shorter cars can be controlled while sliding while longer cars don't slide but when they do you're gone.
Exactly, a longer car is much harder to get sliding, but when it does it's really hard to recover. A shorter car would be easier to get into a slide, and control when sliding. But you dont drive faster when the car slides, thats why it would take more work from the drivers to drive these cars.

User avatar
SectorOne
166
Joined: 26 May 2013, 09:51

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

I think a longer car is easier to control when sliding. It´s a longer pendulum to work with and react to.
"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother that person is a piece of sh*t"

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

SectorOne wrote:I think a longer car is easier to control when sliding. It´s a longer pendulum to work with and react to.
And with more inertia, so more difficult to stop :wink:

Keep in mind that is not my suposition, that´s what Fernando Alonso said. I guess, as always, there´s a limit for everything. If you compare a Smart with a Mercedes, a longer wheelbase is better, but once you go longer and longer, there must be some limit where inertia becomes too big so instead of doing it easier, it becomes more difficult to stop that high mass from moving sideways

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

Just look at it this way: what's the easiest 4 wheeled thing to drift?
Go-karts.
By FAR.
You can literally mind control those things during a slide. And they're pretty short in length, are they not?

feni_remmen
feni_remmen
3
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 15:43

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

I don't have a clue, but my limited understanding was the cars got longer in 1998 to gain some dynamic stability lost when they narrowed the cars. One of the MP4/13's big advantages. Isn't that why everyone but mclaren progressively lengthened their cars throughout 1998. Then they just got progressively longer as it helped the aero?
Also, doesn't the longer car make for a more manageable aero platform (when compared to a shorter car)? will the wider car and bigger tyres allow for a shorter platform? I was surprised when narrower cars got longer..

Also, I seem to remember when they switched to 15" tyres in 1993, didn't it allow teams to run more downforce as the smaller tyres produced less drag? If I recall it didn't impact on lap times much.

It's a shame they didn't kept everything else the same and just plonked 18 or 19" rears on and let the cars be 2metres wide! That would've been great!

PABLOEING
PABLOEING
15
Joined: 12 May 2012, 10:39

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkgBx-MWYAAdDia.jpg

Diffuser in WRC 2017 is like the F1 2017 too?

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

feni_remmen wrote:I don't have a clue, but my limited understanding was the cars got longer in 1998 to gain some dynamic stability lost when they narrowed the cars. One of the MP4/13's big advantages. Isn't that why everyone but mclaren progressively lengthened their cars throughout 1998. Then they just got progressively longer as it helped the aero?
Also, doesn't the longer car make for a more manageable aero platform (when compared to a shorter car)? will the wider car and bigger tyres allow for a shorter platform? I was surprised when narrower cars got longer..

Also, I seem to remember when they switched to 15" tyres in 1993, didn't it allow teams to run more downforce as the smaller tyres produced less drag? If I recall it didn't impact on lap times much.

It's a shame they didn't kept everything else the same and just plonked 18 or 19" rears on and let the cars be 2metres wide! That would've been great!
Cars got longer after all the winglets got banned and diffuser became shorter. Combination of a need to have maximum airflow to the beam wing and rake of the car made it longer. Then fuel tank became larger and turbo needed to be accommodated in the current cars which made them even longer

Wheel bases
1997
2800 mm

1998
2900

2003
3100

2006
3050

2009
3200

2011
3500

2015
3520

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

PABLOEING wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkgBx-MWYAAdDia.jpg

Diffuser in WRC 2017 is like the F1 2017 too?
What exactly are you asking?
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

feni_remmen
feni_remmen
3
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 15:43

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

FW17 wrote:
feni_remmen wrote:I don't have a clue, but my limited understanding was the cars got longer in 1998 to gain some dynamic stability lost when they narrowed the cars. One of the MP4/13's big advantages. Isn't that why everyone but mclaren progressively lengthened their cars throughout 1998. Then they just got progressively longer as it helped the aero?
Also, doesn't the longer car make for a more manageable aero platform (when compared to a shorter car)? will the wider car and bigger tyres allow for a shorter platform? I was surprised when narrower cars got longer..

Also, I seem to remember when they switched to 15" tyres in 1993, didn't it allow teams to run more downforce as the smaller tyres produced less drag? If I recall it didn't impact on lap times much.

It's a shame they didn't kept everything else the same and just plonked 18 or 19" rears on and let the cars be 2metres wide! That would've been great!
Cars got longer after all the winglets got banned and diffuser became shorter. Combination of a need to have maximum airflow to the beam wing and rake of the car made it longer. Then fuel tank became larger and turbo needed to be accommodated in the current cars which made them even longer

Wheel bases
1997
2800 mm

1998
2900

2003
3100

2006
3050

2009
3200

2011
3500

2015
3520
Oh dear. I had no idea we could be up to 3500 wheelbases? No way! That's crazy long. I remember being frustrated that they were at 3000!

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

Current cars have the same footprint as this

Image

mrluke
mrluke
33
Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 20:31

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

If we lopped a metre off of the body length that would bring the weight down a lot.

Generally shorter wheel base cars are more "twitchy" the back comes round quicker and is more difficult to control. A longer wheel base is more stable, the back comes round slower and is easier to control. This is all further affected by weight distribution, overhangs etc etc but that is the general principal.

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Proposed 2017 F1 Aerodynamic Changes

Post

Juzh wrote:Just look at it this way: what's the easiest 4 wheeled thing to drift?
Go-karts.
By FAR.
You can literally mind control those things during a slide. And they're pretty short in length, are they not?
And pretty light too, that must play a role I think