ok we could assume that flaps in front were operated by the jaw. But regarding rear as Buxton said they had adjustable rear. Could that be the reason why they ran this thick DRS actuator and was partially open. Does this thick DRS actuator operates with flaps?LookBackTime wrote:
Gravel Trap: Did Williams use active aero in Spain?
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/blog ... =hootsuite
...
Buxton’s theory which has reportedly been confirmed by sources within the team is that Williams has lost its way somewhat with the balance and setup of the FW38. The wing package used in Barcelona features adjustable elements front and rear. The movement of these elements was automated, controlled by an onboard computer, the computer was said to be responding to signals from a yaw sensor fitted to the car along with the steer angle, air speed and possibly torque demand.
The idea behind it is that the computer would react to the car if it was understeering or oversteering and adjust the wings elements to accordingly, this would at least in theory allow the Williams engineers to find a balanced aerodynamic setup on the car, once they had found the numbers the wings on the race car could be set or reworked accordingly to suit.
...
They had at least one spare since Felipe broke one at the guard rail.Martin_F wrote:Honestly I think there is only one available for Massa and one for Bottas.joseff wrote:Why are they still lugging the old nose/wing around...
Surely they have spares of the new design by now?
Let's hope they survive Monaco.
My idea is that the extra wing will simulate the DF loss when the DRS is fully open. Then they can close DRS flap by incremental amounts to add levels of DF to test the balance. Because the actuator in race probably only has to positions, open and close, this one is a bit larger because it will possibly have the ability to control the angle of the opening of the flap and fine tune the angle of attack.F1NAC wrote:ok we could assume that flaps in front were operated by the jaw. But regarding rear as Buxton said they had adjustable rear. Could that be the reason why they ran this thick DRS actuator and was partially open. Does this thick DRS actuator operates with flaps?LookBackTime wrote:
Gravel Trap: Did Williams use active aero in Spain?
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/blog ... =hootsuite
...
Buxton’s theory which has reportedly been confirmed by sources within the team is that Williams has lost its way somewhat with the balance and setup of the FW38. The wing package used in Barcelona features adjustable elements front and rear. The movement of these elements was automated, controlled by an onboard computer, the computer was said to be responding to signals from a yaw sensor fitted to the car along with the steer angle, air speed and possibly torque demand.
The idea behind it is that the computer would react to the car if it was understeering or oversteering and adjust the wings elements to accordingly, this would at least in theory allow the Williams engineers to find a balanced aerodynamic setup on the car, once they had found the numbers the wings on the race car could be set or reworked accordingly to suit.
...
flickerf1 wrote:New RW for Canada: https://twitter.com/albrodpul/status/740938883664384000