Turn 16 is the turn before long straight, and I don't remember anyone going off there. Lewis ran off 2 times in turn 13, which justmoi is talking about, I believe, and once in turn 1. Turn 1 is the one with the largest run off area.dans79 wrote:lewis went off in 16, it has a huge amount of run off space.justmoi wrote:I seriously fear for any driver who goes into that run off area during the race from missing his turn. He'll have to do a 180 turn or even worse reverse first. Gonna lose a lot of time theredans79 wrote:
yea, he lost 1.2 seconds because of that mistake. One thing fore sure this track will heavily penalize any mistakes on the part of the driver.
Yet Manor are absolutely nowhere. Maybe it's something else like RBR & Ferrari unable to get their tyres working, as per their driver's comments, maybe you could loan them your grinding wheel to generate a bit of heat instead.Juzh wrote:Ferrari and red bulls off the pace. It's clear now. They won't be troubling podim positions at all.
Formula PU106C:
mercedes
williams/force india
Formula rest:
ferrari/toro rosso/red bull/mclaren
OK, maybe I'm missing something and if I am I apologise, but what would you prefer instead of a kerb?Fulcrum wrote:Sorry, that's not an argument that holds much water with me. That's actually part of my point. Placing kerbs on this track where they have effectively neuters it.
Why do the drivers need to have 'something' to 'negotiate' with?
You've stated it yourself. Without kerbs the balancing act is negotiating the wall, which seems a much better application of skill than 'negotiating' an arbitrary point like a kerb.
As such, removing the kerbs would place a much higher emphasis on the driver than the car.
I have a feeling that Baku is going to be both a car breaker and a high error track which will cause a very high attrition rate, making it hard to make any reasonable prediction.wickedz50 wrote:So far only a Lewis win in Baku...
FI for podium prediction wow!!
He's saying that the walls should have been the edge of the track, because it then places more weight on driver skill and car placement.j2004p wrote:OK, maybe I'm missing something and if I am I apologise, but what would you prefer instead of a kerb?Fulcrum wrote:Sorry, that's not an argument that holds much water with me. That's actually part of my point. Placing kerbs on this track where they have effectively neuters it.
Why do the drivers need to have 'something' to 'negotiate' with?
You've stated it yourself. Without kerbs the balancing act is negotiating the wall, which seems a much better application of skill than 'negotiating' an arbitrary point like a kerb.
As such, removing the kerbs would place a much higher emphasis on the driver than the car.
A wall or a white line with identical flat tarmac to the main track on the inside of the white line?
Unfortunately, I believe you're correct. At this track, the Merc engine is worth at least a second over the Renault and probably 1.7-1.8 over the Honda. Red Bull already claimed that they will lose 1.2 seconds just on the main straight, but I don't believe it would be quite that extreme.Juzh wrote:Ferrari and red bulls off the pace. It's clear now. They won't be troubling podim positions at all.
Formula PU106C:
mercedes
williams/force india
Formula rest:
ferrari/toro rosso/red bull/mclaren
Wow thanks for that!!!
What a great camera angle! Great track, really surprised by the enormous corner speeds. This will be a classic venue. The last sector will be action packed during the race. Great slipstream possibilities, also the marginal run-off areas will require maximum concentration from the drivers during the race a small mistake will be severely punished.digitalrurouni wrote:Wow thanks for that!!!