McLaren MP4-31 Honda

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
mrluke
mrluke
33
Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 20:31

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

GoranF1 wrote:
maguetox wrote:
Thunders wrote:Fernando ran a low DF Rear Wing and no Monkey Seat in FP1. Don't know if it was on the Car for the whole Session but after the Red Flag he ran it with Red Flow Viz.

From McLaren Twitter:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClJYRg0UYAA1SJj.jpg
Amaizing how skinny that rear end is.

Great picture
At the exit of pit i saw MP4-31 and the TR from the back....it seems Honda has a lot less cooling needs than 2015 Ferrari.
Bit off topic but TR had to design their car before they knew how much cooling the 15 Ferrari PU would need .

I don't think you can caveat high top speeds by saying they were running low downforce or in a tow, this is going to be true for the other teams as well.

Jef Patat
Jef Patat
61
Joined: 06 May 2011, 14:40

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

https://twitter.com/antoniogranato/stat ... 2895572992 Anyone knows what the lower right measurement is?

Jolle
Jolle
133
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

Jef Patat wrote:https://twitter.com/antoniogranato/stat ... 2895572992
Anyone knows what the lower right measurement is?
Oh no... Now it's all clear, the McLaren is 94.0% a TWat

User avatar
Drica
2
Joined: 04 May 2015, 22:34

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

Jolle wrote:
Jef Patat wrote:https://twitter.com/antoniogranato/stat ... 2895572992
Anyone knows what the lower right measurement is?
Oh no... Now it's all clear, the McLaren is 94.0% a TWat
:lol: :lol: :mrgreen:

User avatar
nevill3
16
Joined: 11 Feb 2014, 21:31
Location: Monaco

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

Jolle wrote:
Jef Patat wrote:https://twitter.com/antoniogranato/stat ... 2895572992
Anyone knows what the lower right measurement is?
Oh no... Now it's all clear, the McLaren is 94.0% a TWat
I think that is actually a 90.0 degrees TWat, that makes them very HOT :oops:
Sent from my Commodore PET in 1978

Jolle
Jolle
133
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

nevill3 wrote:
Jolle wrote:
Jef Patat wrote:https://twitter.com/antoniogranato/stat ... 2895572992
Anyone knows what the lower right measurement is?
Oh no... Now it's all clear, the McLaren is 94.0% a TWat
I think that is actually a 90.0 degrees TWat, that makes them very HOT :oops:
And the ball-press is already at 45%, James Hunt would be proud!

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

It's insane that drivers have to adjust not only brake balance but brake pressure as well.

I think the last reading on the lower right says pCoilSet
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
DiogoBrand
73
Joined: 14 May 2015, 19:02
Location: Brazil

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

godlameroso wrote:It's insane that drivers have to adjust not only brake balance but brake pressure as well.

I think the last reading on the lower right says pCoilSet
Well, it's probably easier to adjust Brake pressure than trying to find the sweet spot on the pedal for every stage of the race.

The writing on the wheel looks more like "pCoilBot" to me. Not a clue what it would mean if that's it though.

User avatar
Redragon
19
Joined: 24 May 2011, 12:23

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

Button 348km/h more than 10km/h than his team mate and is nearly out of q3, so that chassis is not as good as Mclaren are saying. I think it is time to stop to blame the ones who are paying for this project Honda. And be more professionals about it.

User avatar
Drica
2
Joined: 04 May 2015, 22:34

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

Redragon wrote:Button 348km/h more than 10km/h than his team mate and is nearly out of q3, so that chassis is not as good as Mclaren are saying. I think it is time to stop to blame the ones who are paying for this project Honda. And be more professionals about it.
I think he got a huuuugeee tow down the straight, so not really representative

zac510
zac510
22
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 12:58

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

It looks more like Coll(ection) Bot(tle) to me.

techman
techman
-5
Joined: 09 Jun 2016, 10:25

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

i think race pace will be much better, mclaren i think screwed up the qualifying, by sending both of them late. anyway race pace is pretty good from the data in practice.

-wkst-
-wkst-
10
Joined: 29 Jan 2016, 21:55
Location: Austria

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

Drica wrote:
Redragon wrote:Button 348km/h more than 10km/h than his team mate and is nearly out of q3, so that chassis is not as good as Mclaren are saying. I think it is time to stop to blame the ones who are paying for this project Honda. And be more professionals about it.
I think he got a huuuugeee tow down the straight, so not really representative
speed traps:
BUT: 1 sec behind PER: 348
ALO: 3 sec behind RAI: 10 less (was live on air)

User avatar
diffuser
236
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

At Baku,it appears to me, that RBR are runing similiar rear wing DF to what McLaren run at high DF tracks(but much less than what RBR would run at those tracks). Just shows how comprimised we are.

techman
techman
-5
Joined: 09 Jun 2016, 10:25

Re: McLaren MP4-31 Honda

Post

At Baku,it appears to me, that RBR are runing similiar rear wing DF to what McLaren run at high DF tracks(but much less than what RBR would run at those tracks). Just shows how comprimised we are.
if you have read what jenson said in baku the new low configuration rear wings was only used in Baku, and the rear wing in canada was high DF, not only that mclaren were running monkey wings when both redbull andTR did not in canada. the reason behind this was mclaren thought canada will rain but it didnt , very unlucky for them luckily in baku they eventually ran the low DF wing. mclaren chassis is very inferior to redbull, it was very clear in monaco, this is a circuit where BHP have very little influence, just look at williams , redbull always perform well here even when their engine lack a huge defecit in 2014. its a chassis circuit, good efficient aero counts alot, mclaren struggle for pace, very lucky it rain, top team crash out , fantastic pitstop by mclaren when other fumbled, jenson said it best if it was dry race no point would be got in monaco.honda engine is ok. the biggest defecit is the aero/chassis.just like works renault compared to redbull, huge difference in chassis performance