I don't wanna be obtuse here....andylaurence wrote: I'd say they're both road and track toys. If a boot and stereo are required then even a Clio Cup isn't a road car. .
But a Clio cup certainly has a boot and a stereo...It's down to the owner to delete the option of a stereo at no cost.
Mk2
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/ ... &logcode=p
Mk3
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/ ... &logcode=p
Using the SR8 radical as an example of a "road car" is simply too outlandish for me to pass without comment, however.
It has no boot. It has no stereo. It also serves no other purpose than travel ludicrously fast and compromises everything to attain that. I admire it lots!
This is not a road car, it's a niche track car that can legally be driven to and from the track. If anyone uses this car as their daily, or even as their weekend warrior, I'd love to know how much their doctor, osteopath, chiropractor and orthodontist bills come to.
Road cars by my definition should have some form of usability in most weather, with protection from the elements, a bearable ride, some form of stowage space, with the ability to negotiate road humps without re-routing.
Using those parameters you encapsulate everything from superminis to hypercars. Pagani's, Veyron's, La Ferrari's and P1's can all be seen on occasion doing the rounds in London, I've yet to see a Radical.
I accept your view, even if I don't necessarily agree that that is a "road car".
And that is my own flaw.