Alonso is the only driver that could compere with Schumacher. IMO he is by far the best driver of the last decade.Pierce89 wrote:In 2006, Shumi had the fastest car but the Samurai took the WDC.
Renault was the best car because of the mass damper in the first part of the season (they used this since 2005 IIRC). At the German GP 2006 this technology is declared illegal, and Symonds said it's a 0.3 / per lap loss so I assume without that Alonso and Renault would have been easily WDC before Interlagos.Vasconia wrote:Ferrari was only faster(at least Schumi) during the last part of the championship. Renault was clearly the best car in the first half, then a more balanced competition and finally a stronger Ferrari(not with rain, where they s*cked).Pierce89 wrote: In 2006, Shumi had the fastest car but the Samurai took the WDC.
Ferrari improved a lot but the advantage was too big. And yes, without the mass-dumper ban the victory woud have been easier.Spoutnik wrote:Renault was the best car because of the mass damper in the first part of the season (they used this since 2005 IIRC). At the German GP 2006 this technology is declared illegal, and Symonds said it's a 0.3 / per lap loss so I assume without that Alonso and Renault would have been easily WDC before Interlagos.Vasconia wrote:Ferrari was only faster(at least Schumi) during the last part of the championship. Renault was clearly the best car in the first half, then a more balanced competition and finally a stronger Ferrari(not with rain, where they s*cked).Pierce89 wrote: In 2006, Shumi had the fastest car but the Samurai took the WDC.
To be accurate: the Bridgestone's sucked in the rain. Michael's drive in China was incredible and streets ahead of any other Bridgestone runner; even in Hungary he almost pulled a decent result out of the bag (despite no pace at all in the wet) but threw it away by defending a bit too aggressively/not playing the percentages.Vasconia wrote:Ferrari was only faster(at least Schumi) during the last part of the championship. Renault was clearly the best car in the first half, then a more balanced competition and finally a stronger Ferrari(not with rain, where they s*cked).Pierce89 wrote: In 2006, Shumi had the fastest car but the Samurai took the WDC.
Exactly, the Bridgestone in general sucked in rain. And In China Michael drove very well but he was lucky enough because Alonso had a bad set of tyres. He was pulling away before that.f1316 wrote:To be accurate: the Bridgestone's sucked in the rain. Michael's drive in China was incredible and streets ahead of any other Bridgestone runner; even in Hungary he almost pulled a decent result out of the bag (despite no pace at all in the wet) but threw it away by defending a bit too aggressively/not playing the percentages.Vasconia wrote:Ferrari was only faster(at least Schumi) during the last part of the championship. Renault was clearly the best car in the first half, then a more balanced competition and finally a stronger Ferrari(not with rain, where they s*cked).Pierce89 wrote: In 2006, Shumi had the fastest car but the Samurai took the WDC.
I hope Nico can find something more, he usually does when Q3 comes.ChrisDanger wrote:https://i.imgur.com/ACnNeDz.jpg
Even the McLaren did very well on the soft. Can RBR and McLaren both beat the Ferrari's here at Hungary?? that will be awesome [-o< [-o< [-o<ChrisDanger wrote:Ferrari ahead of Red Bull for now, but on the Supersofts. Manor almost 6 seconds off the pace. Wehrlein and Palmer over the 107% rule.
It's only FP1 but it’s not looking good for FerrariVasconia wrote:I hope Nico can find something more, he usually does when Q3 comes.ChrisDanger wrote:https://i.imgur.com/ACnNeDz.jpg
Ferrari looking good but they always look better on Fridays. Only one tenth between Sebastian and Kimi, I expect more from the German.
Mclaren looking good too. TR musst have checked something different because they should be between the ten fastest cars.