According to Sky Germany Ferrari protested against Rosberg
https://twitter.com/...915688288182272
just like last year?Shrieker wrote:Hamilton is much faster on this track. I think at any point it comes to a head to head on track scrap, Roesberg would crash rather than lose out to him.
Interesting, although I doubt they'd deal with it, as they went through to Q2...basti313 wrote:By the way: The stewards have a lot to do.
107-Percent-time 1:39.833
12 3 D. Ricciardo Red Bull 1:39.968 +0:06.666 +0:01.009 10
13 33 M. Verstappen Red Bull 1:40.424 +0:07.122 +0:00.456 10
14 11 S. Perez Force India 1:41.411 +0:08.109 +0:00.987 6
15 27 N. Hülkenberg Force India 1:41.471 +0:08.169 +0:00.060 8
16 77 V. Bottas Williams 1:42.758 +0:09.456 +0:01.287 10
Article 35.1 of the rules:
During Q1, any driver whose best qualifying lap exceeds 107% of the fastest time set during that session, or who fails to set a time, will not be allowed to take part in the race. Under exceptional circumstances however, which may include setting a suitable lap time in a free practice session, the stewards may permit the car to start the race.
Any driver accepted in this manner will be placed at the back of the starting grid after any other penalties have been applied.
haha where were you?, he was investigated and cleared nowGrandAxe wrote:Nico is being investigated. Thank goodness for common sense!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/36876625
It says they're still waiting for official confirmation.siskue2005 wrote:Nico.
no further action
Bianca Leppert @janci1612 14s15 seconds ago
In the case of Rosberg there will be no further action. But the 107 % issue from Q2 is still discussed, could be a long one #F1