Felipe Nasr: September decisive for 2017 Williams or Sauber choice
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.ph ... ice#898126
It seems to me that, contrary to popular belief, Stroll is just as talented as he is well funded.LookBackTime wrote:Nurburgring F3: Stroll passes Gunther for Race 2 win
http://www.motorsport.com/eurof3/news/n ... in-825317/
He is looking good so far.
More to the point these are losses but Ecclestone's money for nothing is bailing them out . Replace it with a decade of -10 (or whatever) million and let's see these profits.LookBackTime wrote:Williams Formula 1 team posts profit in first half of 2016
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.ph ... lf-of-2016
Well seeing as how Bernie money js contractually guaranteed, your little mental exercises without it are pointless. Do you think that without Bernie money, Williams would've spent the same amount? I don't. The numbers are the numbers and Williams was in the green.iotar__ wrote:More to the point these are losses but Ecclestone's money for nothing is bailing them out . Replace it with a decade of -10 (or whatever) million and let's see these profits.LookBackTime wrote:Williams Formula 1 team posts profit in first half of 2016
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.ph ... lf-of-2016
Impact of getting BS bonuses despite results is bigger than linear. Just like McLaren (lesser impact of course) they can afford poor seasons the other teams would not survive. Force India has to skip tests, Sauber the same plus losing staff, drivers etc.