Judging by the amount of question marks, it seemed quite emotionaldobbster71 wrote:Please don't interpret anything emotive in my questions.
Actually that's a very good point. My opinion is that McLaren have a better chassis, certainly aerodynamically, than TR. I'm not entirely sure whether it is as good as TR at warming tyres or delivering mechanical grip though. And imo the Honda Pu is better than the 2015 Ferrari Pu, although how much is hard to say. And it is well known that the Honda Pu is some way behind the Renault Pu still, but being as good as, or better than a 2015 Ferrari Pu in the second season of running is pretty much where I'd expect it to be since they're a year behind on development.dobbster71 wrote:I just wanted some opinions.
Furthermore, I chose to compare McLaren with Torro Rosso due to both teams running unique PU's. No other team runs a Honda PU & no other team runs a 2015 Ferrari PU.
Come on Sayeman.Sayeman wrote:Honda is tolerating Boulier for now because they know the PU is not the best on the grid.kasio wrote:"Boulier Bouls*it."GoranF1 wrote:Suzuka is a great racetrack"
"but the truth is that our car is ill-suited to its long straights and mid- to high-speed corners." EB
This guy would've been kicked out of the team long ago if it were Renault instead of Honda.
Not sure why Boulier is there, dennis runs the whole circus anyway.
It's a heavily power biased track that requires great drive-ability too due to the mid-high speed sweepers that you're accelerating through. It's always been a hard track for poorer engines as you can't put more downforce on to make up for driveability issues without being a sitting duck on the straights (See Alonso last year.....GP2!)loner wrote:what is the rational explaination to SUzuka qualy weak performance!!
A lot more correction whit steering wheel on 2015 car also.....car has improved on all fronts alot its just that everybody else improved almost as much...Alonso Fan wrote:PU improvement's really visible in that video, from the start of the video till the start/finish line when they start the lap
The track looks like a power track- at least for qualifying this year!loner wrote:what is the rational explaination to SUzuka qualy weak performance!!
Power is more important than chassis on Suzuka... Ferrari PU >> Renault PUdiffuser wrote:Before you cast the first stone remember that Ferari has out qualified RBR. does that mean yhey have a better chassis?Goran2812 wrote:and he should shout it... honda did epic work from last season, mclaren not so much... they've been telling tales all year long how the chassis is great bla bla, and then this happens... on hondas home gp... such a shame...
Pretty much. Let's hope for rain and a bit of luck to even things out.Goran2812 wrote:Power is more important than chassis on Suzuka... Ferrari PU >> Renault PUdiffuser wrote:Before you cast the first stone remember that Ferari has out qualified RBR. does that mean yhey have a better chassis?Goran2812 wrote:and he should shout it... honda did epic work from last season, mclaren not so much... they've been telling tales all year long how the chassis is great bla bla, and then this happens... on hondas home gp... such a shame...
And sometimes all the dots connect,for some better, for others worse so...