=D>CAEdevice wrote:Hi etsmc, the exhausts would be a bit to hot in order to have a realistic cooling. Why don't you try to put the engine intake into the cooling ducts, just behind the radiators?
I invested three weeks before the first race only studing the best cooling configuration (the car that I used in the first two races is 95% identical if compared with the car I used for the last KVRC race).RicME85 wrote:It's interesting how all but Matteo are struggling with engine power.
OK, I have received many questions about this now. For one guy I made a good screenshot explaining it very well. If he allows I will write a small blog article about this using the image. If not you will have to wait a few days until I can replicate it on the MantiumRacer. Mainly the problem is that some of your measurement surfaces are triangulated very poorly causing interpolation issues which make the measurement unreliable. I create my own surfaces on the cars with 10mm triangles. This then works very well. There was some talk about this a few weeks ago on this forum.CAEdevice wrote:Good news, thanks for the update.
I have a question about the cooling rules.
Which surface (inlet/outlet) is used to measure the cooling flow (the values are a bit different sometimes)? I have chosen safe settings for the first two races (3.1-3.2 m^3/s), but the competition is getting harder and I have to refine the car.
I am not sure about that: I am using triangles with maximum dimension 8mm and max width/height ratio 2, but I still have a difference between inlet and outlet (0.1-0.15 m3/s). What about using only one measurement surface in the midde of the heat exchanger? It would make things easier also in case of multiple cooling ducts exits (in real cars, cooling ducts exits are not even defined somtimes)LVDH wrote:OK, I have received many questions about this now. For one guy I made a good screenshot explaining it very well. If he allows I will write a small blog article about this using the image. If not you will have to wait a few days until I can replicate it on the MantiumRacer. Mainly the problem is that some of your measurement surfaces are triangulated very poorly causing interpolation issues which make the measurement unreliable. I create my own surfaces on the cars with 10mm triangles. This then works very well. There was some talk about this a few weeks ago on this forum.CAEdevice wrote:Good news, thanks for the update.
I have a question about the cooling rules.
Which surface (inlet/outlet) is used to measure the cooling flow (the values are a bit different sometimes)? I have chosen safe settings for the first two races (3.1-3.2 m^3/s), but the competition is getting harder and I have to refine the car.
Well it is CFD, the numbers never perfectly add up. If you look at flow visualizations you will see recirculation zones in front of the radiator on most cars. This also makes it hard to measure the exact flow on the cooling inlet surface. On the rear one everything is much better straightened out thanks to the radiator. And as the radiator straightens the flow so well and we are getting rid of the other two surfaces there will be a new surface which is actually located in the center of the radiator. This is actually how I measured the flow on you cars for the races.CAEdevice wrote: I am not sure about that: I am using triangles with maximum dimension 8mm and max width/height ratio 2, but I still have a difference between inlet and outlet (0.1-0.15 m3/s). What about using only one measurement surface in the midde of the heat exchanger? It would make things easier also in case of multiple cooling ducts exits (in real cars, cooling ducts exits are not even defined somtimes)
Ok, measuring on the rear outlets looks a good ideaLVDH wrote:Well it is CFD, the numbers never perfectly add up. If you look at flow visualizations you will see recirculation zones in front of the radiator on most cars. This also makes it hard to measure the exact flow on the cooling inlet surface. On the rear one everything is much better straightened out thanks to the radiator. And as the radiator straightens the flow so well and we are getting rid of the other two surfaces there will be a new surface which is actually located in the center of the radiator. This is actually how I measured the flow on you cars for the races.CAEdevice wrote: I am not sure about that: I am using triangles with maximum dimension 8mm and max width/height ratio 2, but I still have a difference between inlet and outlet (0.1-0.15 m3/s). What about using only one measurement surface in the midde of the heat exchanger? It would make things easier also in case of multiple cooling ducts exits (in real cars, cooling ducts exits are not even defined somtimes)
LVDH wrote: center of the radiator
So what is the exact reason for loss of engine power? I made the suspension covers less obstructive and still my power is the sameLVDH wrote:LVDH wrote: center of the radiator