ME4ME wrote:Andres125sx wrote:What?
Alonso got triple points than Kimi in 2014, Seb didn´t get double in 2015. That´s a difference I think.
Maybe it was not me who got asleep through 2015
Going way offtopic here. I'm talking about the manner in which results were achieved, taking into account Kimi entering Alonso's team in 2014. Ferrari having the clear 2nd best car in 2015, a smaller gap in points etc. I found Vettel's results against Kimi as impressive as Alonso's in 2014.
IMO it is the other way around, but I´m not going to start a discussion about past seasons
ME4ME wrote:Any thoughts about the other stuff I wrote, and that motorsport.com article?
I didn´t read anywhere people from McLaren saying their car is great as you said
Anycase it is easy to say they should have a car wich adapts to tracks, but that´s not as easy to do when your car has the less powerful PU of any top team and most midfielders. What should have they done to have a car wich adapts to tracks with long straights and fast corners? You can increase your wings to be ok on fast corners but that will harm you on the straights, or you can decrease your wings to be ok on the straights but that will harm you on fast corners, so not sure what magic setup do you want them to dial in to adapt to tracks like Suzuka and Austin with long straights and also fast corners...
Their car is compromised by a weak PU, and since this is F1 that does not hurt them only at the straights, but also on fast corners as they can´t use as much DF as their competitors. And that´s what they said. What do you find so weird?