the wooden plank was added in 1994, I expect that was the replacement for a minium clearancerjsa wrote:I've been searching t no avail: when did checking ground clearance ceased to be in F1?
They did indeed, right the Senna accident, where at least one of the contributing factors was a stalling of the floor due to extreem low ride heightslangwadt wrote:the wooden plank was added in 1994, I expect that was the replacement for a minium clearancerjsa wrote:I've been searching t no avail: when did checking ground clearance ceased to be in F1?
yes and the plank is a clever way to avoid that in away that can actually be enforced, there is just too many ways to cheat with a minimum ride heightJolle wrote:They did indeed, right the Senna accident, where at least one of the contributing factors was a stalling of the floor due to extreem low ride heightslangwadt wrote:the wooden plank was added in 1994, I expect that was the replacement for a minium clearancerjsa wrote:I've been searching t no avail: when did checking ground clearance ceased to be in F1?
That's got nothing to do with the wear levels, more that teams are allowed to move the mounting points around. So I think RedBull were the first to put almost all right at the frond, so there were 16 tungsten bolts touching the tarmac before the plank was worn down. These days those mounting bolts must be made of magnesium, which is not just nice and sparkling, but wears a lot faster.ESPImperium wrote:Ive always thought that the wear rate depth should have been increased over time in order to stop the rise of the rake in the past few years.
FW17 wrote:If it was only the plank it would have been fine
but in 1995 they added the 50 mm step to floor