Gone from this year, the stalks anyway. Too much aero going on.AnthonyG wrote:Where are the nosecamera's?
I will add: the front wing looks quite sophisticated !!!turbof1 wrote:A couple of things I noticed or think to have noticed:
-Wheelbase looks longer. This is why the car looks to be sleaker at the back as they have reshuffled parts to create a narrower cook bottle.
-Sidepod size seems to be the same as last year. However, the undercut looks much more pronounced.
-Huge turning vanes underneath the nose. It seems that with the increase in length, more regulatory area got freed up for the devices. Although being a launch version, they also look very simplified. Again this could be because they are the launch version, OR because the larger bargeboards have a knock-on effect and require less complex devices in front.
That's because the wheelbase is bigger as well. Wheelbase/track ratio has not been changed that much.timbo wrote:Does not look very wide to me.
I kind of suspect a lot of boring launches tbh.RedNEO wrote:I actually yawned during that launch video. Hopefully we've got most of the boring launches out of the way.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
It felt like somebody just cooked that video up on a 5 minute tea break. Not even a real car just cgi and naturally aspirated engine sounds? They probably knew the video was so dull they had to add something that doesn't even exist anymore.Gerhardsa wrote:I kind of suspect a lot of boring launches tbh.RedNEO wrote:I actually yawned during that launch video. Hopefully we've got most of the boring launches out of the way.
Nobody is going to want to give away any ideas or secrets with their launch cars.