FIA surely does not want such sticks in this area... I say wide open embarrissing loophole.n_anirudh wrote:I dont think this is a loophole. it is clear in the regulations that this region is free to be exploited. It was up to the aero engineers in the teams to have updated their rule books in Oct2016.
FrukostScones wrote:FIA surely does not want such sticks in this area... I say wide open embarrissing loophole.n_anirudh wrote:I dont think this is a loophole. it is clear in the regulations that this region is free to be exploited. It was up to the aero engineers in the teams to have updated their rule books in Oct2016.
clipsy1H wrote:Nothing spectacular, it's a basic car from last year (with more rear room by moving forward) with changes to fit new regulations, to me this car is nothing but normal. In matter of performance they will be same as last year nothing more o less but the good things is if others teams can bring something up they will beat Merc this year. So for now is up to Ferrari, RedBull and maybe Renault with McLaren to show somethings and take the lead because they can right now. Mercedes was so arrogant in this winter that they just fit last year car with 2017 regulation and 1-2 little things because they are sure no one can do more from last year. Now it's time to take over.
Even if it's almost nothing from last year i like the suspension, there is something to watch in next days and also the side pods which are bad ass.
roon wrote:It's actually for the street circuits.bhall II wrote:My guess is that the coat rack is meant to clean up air flow from the cameras mounted to the airbox, because the area it will affect is just about the same size as those cameras. This sort of stuff wouldn't really an issue with higher wings--if it is now.
http://i.imgur.com/6sTNcEi.jpg
Or it's a red herring.
EDIT: pic
http://www.myweb.net.au/mottram/trams/z ... ne_257.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/G5zDU1Nl.jpg
Its a good idea to include evidence of your claim to, where is this confirmed, do you have pictures, videos or etc?F1Krof wrote:The t-tray is for 360deg camera mounting. Case solved. =D>
Here's the thing: even though I don't necessarily share his opinion, I can easily understand it. Thus far, and of what we can see, there's not a whole lot on WAldoCosta that we haven't seen before in one guise or another...Hail22 wrote:[...]clipsy1H wrote:Nothing spectacular, it's a basic car from last year (with more rear room by moving forward) with changes to fit new regulations, to me this car is nothing but normal. In matter of performance they will be same as last year nothing more o less but the good things is if others teams can bring something up they will beat Merc this year. So for now is up to Ferrari, RedBull and maybe Renault with McLaren to show somethings and take the lead because they can right now. Mercedes was so arrogant in this winter that they just fit last year car with 2017 regulation and 1-2 little things because they are sure no one can do more from last year. Now it's time to take over.
Even if it's almost nothing from last year i like the suspension, there is something to watch in next days and also the side pods which are bad ass.
In the absence of Xpensive, CrucialXtreme and waiting for Bhall to turn up...This is how I can sum up your post good sir / madam:
[...]
F1.com, Feb 23, 2017 wrote:"As you have seen, the launch spec was without the little T-wing, and then we tested it – and then we will carry on in Barcelona day by day testing different configurations,” Costa explained.
“We will have as well a longer tail configuration to be tested in combination with new rear wings for Melbourne.
“The car in essence from now until Melbourne will change all the aerodynamic surfaces."
I am sorry to say F1Krof that if you know how a 360 camera works that t-tray it is the most hideous one to work with, specially in movement. So I can tell you it is not for the 360 camera.JesperA wrote:Its a good idea to include evidence of your claim to, where is this confirmed, do you have pictures, videos or etc?F1Krof wrote:The t-tray is for 360deg camera mounting. Case solved. =D>