No, because nobody is running flat out.Yurasyk wrote:Is it safe (looking at the speedtrap scores) to say that Ferrari lacks in downforce?
No, because nobody is running flat out.Yurasyk wrote:Is it safe (looking at the speedtrap scores) to say that Ferrari lacks in downforce?
About the only thing you can determine from max speed data (not speed trap), is that Vettel might have been pushing harder.Yurasyk wrote:Heredans79 wrote:where did you find speed trap data?
http://www.f1today.net/en/live/f1/22267 ... st-of-2017
Maybe they have a magical solution that causes less drag?Yurasyk wrote:Is it safe (looking at the speedtrap scores) to say that Ferrari lacks in downforce?
For the gazillionth time: pole record is 1:19.995 by webber in 2010, outright track record is 1:19.954 by Barichello 2009 Q2.f1316 wrote:So quali record at Barcelona from this configuration of the circuit in 2008 was 1:20.5 84.
Very safe.Yurasyk wrote:Is it safe (looking at the speedtrap scores) to say that Ferrari lacks in downforce?
Mercedes 287.2km/h; Ferrari 285.1km/h best of all BCN Tests 2016AMG.Tzan wrote:What about speed traps compaired to last year?? How many km/h are they down??
Assuming this is the start/finish line speed trap (pure guess) merc is 14 kmh down on what they did last year in quali, Vettel is 7 kmh down, ricciardo 11 kmh down.AMG.Tzan wrote:What about speed traps compaired to last year?? How many km/h are they down??
This comparison by amus was a bunch of BS, and didn't account for slipstreaming cars (renault at 342 kmh in testing, 330 in actual qualifying). I remember how people got all up in the air about renault suddenly leapfrogging mercedes at the timeFrukostScones wrote: AMUS last year, then measured from finsh to topspeed and trie dto deduct engine power comparison.
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/form ... 29822.html
Mclaren's pit crew were when Alonso's car died in the pits.PhillipM wrote:No, because nobody is running flat out.Yurasyk wrote:Is it safe (looking at the speedtrap scores) to say that Ferrari lacks in downforce?
it is about the finish line data today, thank you!Juzh wrote:This comparison by amus was a bunch of BS, and didn't account for slipstreaming cars (renault at 342 kmh in testing, 330 in actual qualifying). I remember how people got all up in the air about renault suddenly leapfrogging mercedes at the timeFrukostScones wrote: AMUS last year, then measured from finsh to topspeed and trie dto deduct engine power comparison.
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/form ... 29822.html
Cool, ok, fair enough.Juzh wrote:For the gazillionth time: pole record is 1:19.995 by webber in 2010, outright track record is 1:19.954 by Barichello 2009 Q2.f1316 wrote:So quali record at Barcelona from this configuration of the circuit in 2008 was 1:20.5 84.
Or it could mean that Ferrari PU is better.Yurasyk wrote:Is it safe (looking at the speedtrap scores) to say that Ferrari lacks in downforce?