The reason I'm not down on Gary Anderson's constant Ferrari praising - aside from my inherent bias + the welcome change from Mercedes/Red Bull drooling that we've had for what seems like forever - is that these observations from a trained observer (god knows, Anderson comes out with some spurious claims some time, but he is at least qualified to provide insight on how cars handle) are probably the most insightful information we have available right now - given we don't have gps, fuel loads or even stint length much of the time.
As I've said before, it's been a very long time since we've seen a Ferrari where trackside observations did not tell of nervousness, twitchiness (relative to the competition) or several corrections into corners, so this is an interesting observation and bodes better for a competitive season than lap times themselves. It would be one thing if all of this year's cars were planted on rails but this does not appear to be the case and, again, I think Anderson is qualified enough to interpret fuel loads/long runs into that kind of analysis.
I wonder if the understeer he mentions several times on the Mercedes is actually a consequence of the long wheelbase - that there has come a point at which the physical difficulty of pushing a long thing into a corner cannot be completely overcome by the downforce gained over its additional surface (there must, surely, be such a point, regardless of whether Mercedes has found it or not). Which is not to say it's not still faster but it may well be harder work, which is interesting in relation to Rosberg's remarks on driver fatigue.
Just some thoughts whilst we wait for things to get going again - probably rubbish