You got that right, they have a chance. But realistically, a very very slim one. Over the last years, neither Ferrari nor Red Bull have shown to be able to out-develop Mercedes. In the areas they did, that was because of the vast deficit they had right from the start.godlameroso wrote: ↑24 Mar 2017, 21:23We won't see all the cards on the table until qualifying. Mercedes is definitely ahead, if they're only ahead by .5 seconds or less, that's not insurmountable. Last year Ferrari was .7 off the pace so there was no hope, and Red Bull was .5 off the pace. They(RB) were the only ones that could bother Mercedes and the only other team to win a race. If Ferrari is .5 or less off the pace they have a chance to catch up through chassis and engine developments,
If it is wet there is a greather chance fo Alonso pole position than if it is dry.
You didn't read what you posted did you?dans79 wrote: ↑24 Mar 2017, 23:10Softs and super softs are the mandatory compounds.
http://www.fia.com/news/f1-pirelli-anno ... ese-grands
The top teams will do Q2 on super softs and start with those, and then one stop for softs. I think starting on ultra softs would require two stops or a compromised pace. With the low deg, I don't know if a 2 stopper would be a good idea.
Baring incidents of some kind the order after 2 or 3 laps, will probably be the finishing order.
I did, that's why I added a qualifier/explanation.