F1 tech(electric side..HERS,KERS and Software) translated to the road and 2021 F1 engine(share cost).
The small teams want cheaper engines.
NO sharing on ICE.
Source?Sasha wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 17:37Honda's CEO and Board have decided to take a new path for the company. No more doing everything in house but still will not buy the tech.Their plan now is to partner with the best in each field.So sharing ideas.They started this new company plan by joining GM with the future 2020 Fuel Cell and Hitachi with future EV.
So Honda and MB are in talks in sharing ideas on the PU.(to share cost to get it on the public road faster)
Here https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merc ... an-897829/nzjrs wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 18:04Source?Sasha wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 17:37Honda's CEO and Board have decided to take a new path for the company. No more doing everything in house but still will not buy the tech.Their plan now is to partner with the best in each field.So sharing ideas.They started this new company plan by joining GM with the future 2020 Fuel Cell and Hitachi with future EV.
So Honda and MB are in talks in sharing ideas on the PU.(to share cost to get it on the public road faster)
Sources have revealed that Honda has recently begun discussions with Mercedes about a plan for the German car manufacturer to provide consultancy assistance to help it make rapid progress with its power unit.
Although it is understood the specifics of the deal have yet to be signed off, the main focus could be on help with the electronic and hybrid area of the power unit.
Combustion software? As in tuning parameters? Or hybrid management software?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 21:40I think it will only go as far as combustion software - which Honda will pay for. They will not show them anything.
So, because Honda entered F1 before they were ready they get special assistance?GoranF1 wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 15:51Mercedes has started V6 Hybrid development in 2010, Ferrari and Renault in 2011 and Honda in 2014....this move is ok.wuzak wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 15:28The other manufacturers are stuck with the same restrictions but have made better progress.Andres125sx wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 11:01
They only need to stop interfering on normal engineering process with their development restrictions. Then Honda would solve all their problems by theirselves.
No need to give them any unfair advantage, as people is wildly speculating around here, only let them do their job, unlike this past two seasons, or this one with allocation restrictions.
Honda is MUCH better at their job than FIA or the Strategy Group at theirs, they only need these bunch of bastards to stop tying Honda´s hands with development restrictions![]()
![]()
![]()
If they want to limit costs, start limiting aero wich currently is free and astronomically expensive (and also the reason for limited overtaking), but the PU is the core of any motorsport and should be the last aspect to be restricted
And, as we have seen the past two seasons, Honda and McLaren haven't been shy at exceeding the year's allocation for power unit components.
If they are getting software help I'm assuming they are already using (or recently switched to) the same software as merc. I think both already used CATIA for CAD modeling, but I have no idea what Merc uses for CFD,combustion, mechatronics and multiphysics stuff (Remembering DS software is notoriously bitchy about how it plays with others...even in its own camp!)godlameroso wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 21:52Combustion software? As in tuning parameters? Or hybrid management software?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 21:40I think it will only go as far as combustion software - which Honda will pay for. They will not show them anything.
I remember two occasions when I was testing tires on a certain SUV-type vehicle and the powdered-metal connecting rods found their way through the side of the block. This caused a water leak, among other things...MrPotatoHead wrote: ↑24 Apr 2017, 22:15godlameroso wrote: ↑24 Apr 2017, 22:13Vandoorne's car was reported to have a water leak as the cause of his non start. Perhaps more flexible coolant pipes?
I imagine that was the least of your problems at the time.
Research and development. Tbink of it as a wind tunnel upgrade or a custom program for your CFD software. Alot of the time software limiyations can force you to make assumptions or got trial and error in your lab scale stuff..godlameroso wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 21:52Combustion software? As in tuning parameters? Or hybrid management software?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 21:40I think it will only go as far as combustion software - which Honda will pay for. They will not show them anything.
Better custom meshes for more accurate chamber modeling perhaps? I know that is one of the biggest KIVA limitations when it comes to valve angle and port design and turbulence modeling. Although I'm sure whatever they're using is far more advanced than that, and probably a custom program.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑26 Apr 2017, 02:13Research and development. Tbink of it as a wind tunnel upgrade or a custom program for your CFD software. Alot of the time software limiyations can force you to make assumptions or got trial and error in your lab scale stuff..godlameroso wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 21:52Combustion software? As in tuning parameters? Or hybrid management software?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 21:40I think it will only go as far as combustion software - which Honda will pay for. They will not show them anything.
With the right software Honda would be able to properly analyse the details of their combustion problems and fix it by them selves i suspect.
Some pretty cool insights about meshing. https://www.cfdengine.com/blog/what-next-for-cfd/godlameroso wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 21:52Better custom meshes for more accurate chamber modeling perhaps?
The other manufacturers followed the normal learnign curve when you develop a new concept, while Honda joined the race later, so they were forced to join a race where their competitors had an advantage in that learning curvewuzak wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 15:28The other manufacturers are stuck with the same restrictions but have made better progress.Andres125sx wrote: ↑25 Apr 2017, 11:01They only need to stop interfering on normal engineering process with their development restrictions. Then Honda would solve all their problems by theirselves.hazelnut120 wrote: ↑24 Apr 2017, 12:09Formula 1's Strategy Group is set to face calls on whether it should intervene to help Honda make better progress, on the back of the Japanese manufacturer's difficult start to the 2017 season.
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-s ... da-897438/
No need to give them any unfair advantage, as people is wildly speculating around here, only let them do their job, unlike this past two seasons, or this one with allocation restrictions.
Honda is MUCH better at their job than FIA or the Strategy Group at theirs, they only need these bunch of bastards to stop tying Honda´s hands with development restrictions![]()
![]()
![]()
If they want to limit costs, start limiting aero wich currently is free and astronomically expensive (and also the reason for limited overtaking), but the PU is the core of any motorsport and should be the last aspect to be restricted