https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRn4K8I ... oThreeFourNathanOlder wrote: ↑14 May 2017, 21:20Thought the race was good, and makes the championship a very interesting one for sure. As for the incident in to T1 as Vettel came out of the pits, I thought it was a bit lucky to not get a penalty as he had a car fully up the side and he ran the other car completely off the track including a push (contact) so I was a little to surprised to see nothing come of it. It was nothing like the Bottas incident on lap 1 as kimi closed in on him and gave him nowhere to go, Seb used the whole track from apex on the right to white line on the left with Hamilton completely on his side the whole time. In the drivers conference Seb smiled and said he left Lewis room which Lewis laughed and disagreed with.
Anyway it wouldn't have effected the result, it would have just been nice to see the stewards not allowing someone to run someone completely off the race track.
Wait.. what?komninosm wrote: ↑16 May 2017, 17:03https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRn4K8I ... oThreeFourNathanOlder wrote: ↑14 May 2017, 21:20Thought the race was good, and makes the championship a very interesting one for sure. As for the incident in to T1 as Vettel came out of the pits, I thought it was a bit lucky to not get a penalty as he had a car fully up the side and he ran the other car completely off the track including a push (contact) so I was a little to surprised to see nothing come of it. It was nothing like the Bottas incident on lap 1 as kimi closed in on him and gave him nowhere to go, Seb used the whole track from apex on the right to white line on the left with Hamilton completely on his side the whole time. In the drivers conference Seb smiled and said he left Lewis room which Lewis laughed and disagreed with.
Anyway it wouldn't have effected the result, it would have just been nice to see the stewards not allowing someone to run someone completely off the race track.
at 0:30
pretty obvious penalty for Vettel.
Just like when he was outside his starting box in previous race.
It seems FIArrari is back in force this year.
This!bonjon1979 wrote: ↑16 May 2017, 16:54The VSC put Ferrari in a lose-lose situation as it provided Hamilton the opportunity to pit early and get rid of the Medium tyres far earlier then expected. Ferrari could try to stay out on the softs but that would mean Hamilton got ahead of them with the undercut. Or they could do what they did, which is pit to maintain track position and hope that they could keep ahead of Merc which is what they did. Because they HAD to run the medium compounds in that final stint they were always going to suffer if an opportunity arose for merc to pull an early pitstop. I really don't see what Ferrari could've done any different.
Why?
show me the rule that says Vettel broke any rule lining up where he did or leaving the pits in this race.
I think those incidents were the reason this rule was clarified in the first place.
It's called leaving a car length if an opponent is along side your car.giantfan10 wrote: ↑16 May 2017, 17:36show me the rule that says Vettel broke any rule lining up where he did or leaving the pits in this race.
If hamilton didnt want to get squeezes off the track he should have slowed down... the driver on the inside of a corner on the optimum life normally does as he pleases
I believe there could be even less seconds. As estimated, under VSC the car on pit spends 33 second between two safety-car lines when the rival car on the track spends 19 seconds for that segment. That means 33-19=14 seconds to lose by a pitstop. That results hypothetical 6 seconds behind Ham.
komninosm wrote: ↑16 May 2017, 18:19It's called leaving a car length if an opponent is along side your car.giantfan10 wrote: ↑16 May 2017, 17:36show me the rule that says Vettel broke any rule lining up where he did or leaving the pits in this race.
If hamilton didnt want to get squeezes off the track he should have slowed down... the driver on the inside of a corner on the optimum life normally does as he pleases
It might have changed, but I doubt it.