Thanks but No thanks,
This is a track that should favor Mercedes. They still have a power unit advantage. Especially evident in qualifying. I don't see Ferrari beating them there. Both Hamilton and Bottas are typically good there too. Predict a Mercedes 1-2.
And the fact that they cant get the ultrasoft to work just doesnt matter right?Hammerfist wrote: ↑02 Jun 2017, 01:47This is a track that should favor Mercedes. They still have a power unit advantage. Especially evident in qualifying. I don't see Ferrari beating them there. Both Hamilton and Bottas are typically good there too. Predict a Mercedes 1-2.
Like always, we'll have to wait and see. Canada is a different type of track under different conditions. Mercedes could hit the sweet spot.giantfan10 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2017, 12:25And the fact that they cant get the ultrasoft to work just doesnt matter right?Hammerfist wrote: ↑02 Jun 2017, 01:47This is a track that should favor Mercedes. They still have a power unit advantage. Especially evident in qualifying. I don't see Ferrari beating them there. Both Hamilton and Bottas are typically good there too. Predict a Mercedes 1-2.
Your prediction would be perfect in 2016... not 2017...
Im not that sure.....with so much negative aero effects of the giant wings it has been a huge chore keeping up close enough to make a pass. Most people wont throw it all in like seb did in china. if at all DRS has helped facilitate an opportunity to pass rather than breeze bys this year for the most partArtur Craft wrote: ↑02 Jun 2017, 11:26tbh, I think Ferrari and Mclaren made the right choices with the tyres. CGV have only long straights and a few slow corners so the degradation shouldn't be high even on the US and the performance crossover(from softer and harder tyres) might happen very late into a stint, as was the case everywhere else.
I would love if they didn't have DRS zones on this track. I guess there would be plenty of good overtakings without it instead of boring fly-bys.
DRS mostly helped, so far, this year because most tracks are difficult to pass. The race I most enjoyed was China and it was good because the DRS was almost neutral there as the track already offers opportunity for passing. Canada have always been good for overtaking, I don't think DRS was ever necessary there.cplchanb wrote: ↑02 Jun 2017, 15:29Im not that sure.....with so much negative aero effects of the giant wings it has been a huge chore keeping up close enough to make a pass. Most people wont throw it all in like seb did in china. if at all DRS has helped facilitate an opportunity to pass rather than breeze bys this year for the most part
China was your favourite cause it is good to pass. Well then Canada should be good with DRS too since China is even easier with that massive straight. And btw last year china GP is the record for most OT.Artur Craft wrote: ↑02 Jun 2017, 15:49DRS mostly helped, so far, this year because most tracks are difficult to pass. The race I most enjoyed was China and it was good because the DRS was almost neutral there as the track already offers opportunity for passing. Canada have always been good for overtaking, I don't think DRS was ever necessary there.cplchanb wrote: ↑02 Jun 2017, 15:29Im not that sure.....with so much negative aero effects of the giant wings it has been a huge chore keeping up close enough to make a pass. Most people wont throw it all in like seb did in china. if at all DRS has helped facilitate an opportunity to pass rather than breeze bys this year for the most part