They banged the front wheels, and the shunt wasn't that much of an impact to destroy the gearbox. But tough luck man, Lewis'NathanOlder wrote: ↑07 Jul 2017, 20:52Precautionary change due to damage sustained in Baku. The Vettel incident ??!!??
They banged the front wheels, and the shunt wasn't that much of an impact to destroy the gearbox. But tough luck man, Lewis'NathanOlder wrote: ↑07 Jul 2017, 20:52Precautionary change due to damage sustained in Baku. The Vettel incident ??!!??
It's sad that someone actually thought of that...
The yellow arrows on the pictures on the previous page points most of the differences.
There is a prescribed maximum height/length ratio for suspension arm cross-sections. Two short-chord arms will be thinner (less frontal area) than one long-chord arm.atanatizante wrote: ↑08 Jul 2017, 18:07https://s2.postimg.org/b11b9mfy1/2017-0 ... h-2017.jpg
1. Those vertical strakes carved into the leading and trailing edge of the FW are new as Motorsport.com is saying?
2. Why is that carbon fiber fairings divided there? Coz one is for the drive shaft and another one is for the lower wishbone? Then why they didn`t create a big single one fairing simulating a kind of lower rear wing over the crash structure, like they have had in the past? Having 2 fairings would help them in adding DF maybe?
Lower drag coefficient, smaller frontal area and better airflow towards the rear, as always when it comes to mirrors. Visibility is not a priority heremorefirejules08 wrote: ↑09 Jul 2017, 20:57Does anyone have an idea what Mercedes are trying to achieve with the new mirror stalks?
I believe the regulations also state that there must be five individual/exposed connections to the upright (2 upper wishbone, 2 lower wishbone, 1 pushrod/pullrod) but no minimum number at the gearbox, that's why the fairing is partially split. For the front upright it's six (2 upper wishbone, 2 lower wishbone, 1 pushrod/pullrod, 1 steering arm).roon wrote: ↑08 Jul 2017, 18:49There is a prescribed maximum height/length ratio for suspension arm cross-sections. Two short-chord arms will be thinner (less frontal area) than one long-chord arm.atanatizante wrote: ↑08 Jul 2017, 18:07https://s2.postimg.org/b11b9mfy1/2017-0 ... h-2017.jpg
1. Those vertical strakes carved into the leading and trailing edge of the FW are new as Motorsport.com is saying?
2. Why is that carbon fiber fairings divided there? Coz one is for the drive shaft and another one is for the lower wishbone? Then why they didn`t create a big single one fairing simulating a kind of lower rear wing over the crash structure, like they have had in the past? Having 2 fairings would help them in adding DF maybe?
Also, now that they can alter the arm AoA +/-10°, it becomes feasible to make something akin to a two-element wing.theWPTformula wrote: ↑10 Jul 2017, 13:30I believe the regulations also state that there must be five individual/exposed connections to the upright (2 upper wishbone, 2 lower wishbone, 1 pushrod/pullrod) but no minimum number at the gearbox, that's why the fairing is partially split. For the front upright it's six (2 upper wishbone, 2 lower wishbone, 1 pushrod/pullrod, 1 steering arm).roon wrote: ↑08 Jul 2017, 18:49There is a prescribed maximum height/length ratio for suspension arm cross-sections. Two short-chord arms will be thinner (less frontal area) than one long-chord arm.atanatizante wrote: ↑08 Jul 2017, 18:07https://s2.postimg.org/b11b9mfy1/2017-0 ... h-2017.jpg
1. Those vertical strakes carved into the leading and trailing edge of the FW are new as Motorsport.com is saying?
2. Why is that carbon fiber fairings divided there? Coz one is for the drive shaft and another one is for the lower wishbone? Then why they didn`t create a big single one fairing simulating a kind of lower rear wing over the crash structure, like they have had in the past? Having 2 fairings would help them in adding DF maybe?