You're allowed one change
You're allowed one change
In the context of Silverstone here.
If one observes the speed carried through that corner, it becomes apparent that, in spite of being full throttle, Vettel carried less speed (I am assuming it was around 260/270 as the graphic does not show digital speed) than Lewis did (though he went off throttle).Phil wrote: ↑23 Jul 2017, 12:24Different power band, different downforce levels, different drag levels, different grip, different speed, different car (weight)?Juzh wrote: ↑23 Jul 2017, 11:44Lets stay civil. Honest question here to counter this argument. Why the RB6 with a 750 bhp torqueless V8 didn't need a downshift, but somehow W08 with ~1000 bhp and massive torque does?Phil wrote: ↑23 Jul 2017, 10:26Did you guys consider that perhaps some corners are flat (throttle wise), but due to the compression, the car itself at that speed no longer has the power to retain the speed despite being flat?
I.e Silverstone where Hamiltons footage shower hin shifting down a gear and taking sone corners in 7th gear instead of 8th?
https://vimeo.com/198559914
Yes, Hamilton carries more speed trough the corner even though he lifts and downshifts. It's a byproduct of having so much power. It was known before the race cars would most likely carry more speed trough there than the RB6 but will probably have to lift. In my opinion 2017 cars simply have too much power to take copse full throttle. In order to remain flat in 8th he'd need an extra ~20-25 kph mid corner speed and that's too much (for now, it could change next year).GPR-A wrote: ↑23 Jul 2017, 14:13If one observes the speed carried through that corner, it becomes apparent that, in spite of being full throttle, Vettel carried less speed (I am assuming it was around 260/270 as the graphic does not show digital speed) than Lewis did (though he went off throttle).Phil wrote: ↑23 Jul 2017, 12:24Different power band, different downforce levels, different drag levels, different grip, different speed, different car (weight)?Juzh wrote: ↑23 Jul 2017, 11:44
Lets stay civil. Honest question here to counter this argument. Why the RB6 with a 750 bhp torqueless V8 didn't need a downshift, but somehow W08 with ~1000 bhp and massive torque does?
https://vimeo.com/198559914
https://s21.postimg.org/ibfcnm38n/SILVERSTONE.png
https://i.gyazo.com/38342c752e79be31cb1 ... 305aa3.jpg
Or the other way round: If they exchange the engine after a few laps, they might need to lift.
No. That was the classic double turn problem; where taking the first turn too fast will compromise speed thru the second turn. In other words he could have went flat in the first turn if he wanted to, but the lap time would be slower if he did.Phil wrote: ↑23 Jul 2017, 10:26Did you guys consider that perhaps some corners are flat (throttle wise), but due to the compression, the car itself at that speed no longer has the power to retain the speed despite being flat?
I.e Silverstone where Hamiltons footage shower hin shifting down a gear and taking sone corners in 7th gear instead of 8th?
Yeah, that was really cool. Maybe they figured it was too much information for the casual viewer, and would possibly deter new ones? I mean, us data geeks, they've got us by the balls already.
I have same memories, Hungary has lot of fun when its wet.garyjpaterson wrote: ↑21 Jul 2017, 10:11Wasn't 2014 very wet indeed at the start? I remember Lewis, starting from the pitlane spinning at T2 and just touching the wall.godlameroso wrote: ↑21 Jul 2017, 00:58No rain expected all weekend long. 2014 was dry and it was a crazy race so it's not a complete given.